Why we should have no issues with political dynasts

If we take politics as a profession, with a structured salary, emoluments etc, we should have no problem with a politician being progeny of a politician. He/she is just another politician

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | May 19, 2014




Dynasty (noun): “1.1 A succession of people from the same family who play a prominent role in business, politics, or another field: ‘the Guinness dynasty’.”

Among many reasons to celebrate these general elections, we are told, is the withering away of the dynasties. The Congress could well be shorn of the Gandhis, the Lalu Prasad dynasty has been cut short, Mulayam Singh Yadav would only have family members as his Samajwadi Party comrades in parliament, the Karunanidhi family has to wait till the next Lok Sabha or the Tamil Nadu assembly polls (or whichever comes first) to have any chance of a look-in...

The dynasts, we are told, are as bad for democracy as desi ghee is for a person with heart condition. And in that, we are told, the people have given us freedom, unshackled us from a misery that had engulfed us for much of the sixty-plus years since independence.

This was a remarkable election that should be cherished for giving us a clear verdict. An outsider, in more ways than one, having won a mandate that was last won back in 1984 by, well, a ‘dynast’.

So did the voters vote out Rahul Gandhi, Karunanidhi, Lalu et al this time and raise the flag of democratic polity further? Or were the voters to be blamed for throwing us back to the feudal times by voting en masse for Rajiv Gandhi in 1984? How can we hail the voter in both cases?

Or, should we blame the voters for 1984 and hail them for 2014?

Take, for instance, the Uttar Pradesh assembly elections of 2012. Every other person who has ever lived in UP under a Mulayam Singh Yadav administration whines about the alleged administration-criminal nexus, and yet the state overwhelmingly voted for his son. Did they want a dynasty back in power? Well...

Did they vote for development? Well...

Did they want to just rid themselves of Mayawati and get in the next possible solution? Heck, yes!

So, we come back to the 16th Lok Sabha and ask a similar set of questions:

Did the voters want to get rid of a dynasty? Well...

Did they vote for development? Well...

Did they want to just rid themselves of the Manmohan Singh government and get in the next possible solution? Heck, yes!

This is in no way putting posers before the mandate for Modi. This is only to wonder aloud whether ‘dynasty’ and the much-tossed-around contention of people getting tired of the family-dom is a valid one. And, as the Congress working committee (CWC) meets to decide the party’s future – and that of the Nehru-Gandhi family as well, as reports forecast – whether the voters ‘punished the family’, as many point out.

If we take politics as a profession, and the representatives elected primarily to legislate and make laws and those in administration only to administer and govern the rest, logically there should not be a problem with dynasties or the favoured families – first, second, third or nth.

Do we have a problem visiting doctors whose father were medical practitioners as well? Logically, no.

Do we have a problem if defence personnel’s sons/daughters get into the forces to secure us? No.

Do we have a nagging doubt buying stuff manufactured by a family-owned business? Ideally, no.

Do we have a problem reading newspapers run by people whose family owns/runs those newspapers? No.

Going by the same logic – the premise being politics is a profession, with a structured salary, emoluments etc – we should have no problem with a politician being the son or daughter of a politician. He/she is just another politician.

The Americans, for instance, have had little trouble with political families like those of the Kennedys, Bush(es), or the Clintons, to take just three examples.

The reason we have a problem is, we, in India, believe politics is some sort of pious ‘tyaag’ and that politicians have to renounce a lot to be allowed to enter those hallowed chambers. The politicians, no doubt, play on those sentiments.

But cut the emotional claptrap about renunciation – or tyaag/tapasya, as netas love to tell us – to add a normal professional routine to the ‘profession’, and many misgivings can be addressed.

The average Indian voter is perhaps smarter than we think he is – perhaps she does not either vote in or vote out a dynasty. Perhaps it’s just her/his wish to see a particular party or individual family to address the common woes.

 

 

Comments

 

Other News

Look who’s talking ethics in Karnataka?

 Just after the UP assembly election in 1996, I was among the scores of reporters waiting at Kalyan Singh’s residence, waiting to get the first inkling of the future course of the BJP. The party had secured the maximum seats – 174 out of 425 seats – but was short of the majority mark

Company secretaries are gatekeepers of corporate governance: SEBI Chairman

“Company Secretaries, once known as secretaries to the board and management, have transformed themselves into key managerial and governance professionals. Today they are recognised for their importance on corporate landscape and have become gatekeepers of corporate governance,” said Ajay Tyagi,

Will there be light at the end of the tunnel?

Any good news which promises to bring about qualitative improvement in the lives of people, especially in rural India, is always welcome. It was heartening indeed to learn that every single village in the country now has access to electricity, as announced by the prime minister on April 29. This is most ce

A dry run in Bundelkhand

The paved road, the few concrete houses and men on motorcycles – these are deceptive signs of development in Madralalpur village. Only a couple of weeks ago, Babu, a 47-year-old distressed farmer, had hanged himself from a babool tree. Villagers were gathered at his house as his wife, mother, sister-

Our jobs, their jobs

Statistics has come a long way from the time when British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli observed: “There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.” Statistics is now an accredited branch of applied mathematics; statistical methods are routinely used to prove or disprove the

Why hasty ordinance on rape of minors needs gender balance

Of all offences, it’s the crime of rape that fires public sentiment the most, eliciting an outrage that exceeds the seemingly worst felony of all – murder too. It has probably more to do with the offence and associated gory details staying, even being replayed ruthlessly, in memory with continu

Current Issue

Current Issue

Video

CM Nitish’s convoy attacked in Buxar

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter