Intel settles FTC charges of anti-competitive conduct

Order to be finalized after 30 days public comments

PTI | August 5, 2010



Global computer chip major Intel has reached at a settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission to resolve the anti-competitive charges against it and agreed to follow series of restrictions.

"Intel has agreed to provisions that will open the door to renewed competition and prevent Intel from suppressing competition in the future," the FTC statement said.

The settlement prohibits Intel from using threats, bundled prices or other offers to hamper competition and prevent computer makers from buying Central Processing Units (CPU), Graphics Processing Units (GPU) and chipsets from competitors.

The settlement also prohibits the chip maker from deceiving computer manufacturers about the performance of non-Intel CPUs or GPUs, the statement added.

However, the settlement leaves enough leeway for Intel to innovate and offer competitive pricing, it added.

"This case demonstrates that the FTC is willing to challenge anti competitive conduct by even the most powerful companies in the fastest-moving industries," FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said.

"By accepting this settlement, we open the door to competition today and address Intel's anticompetitive conduct in a way that may not have been available in a final judgment years from now ... it allows all the companies in this dynamic industry to move ahead and build better, more innovative products," Leibowitz added.

The FTC had sued Intel in December, 2009, alleging that the company used anticompetitive tactics to cut off rivals' access to the marketplace and deprive consumers of choice and innovation in the microchips that comprise computers' central processing unit.

These chips are critical components that often are referred to as the 'brain' of a computer.

The settlement also requires Intel to modify its intellectual property agreements with its main rival AMD, and Taiwan-based microprocessor maker Via Technologies Inc. and Nvidia Corp, which specialises in graphics chips.

These companies would have more freedom to consider mergers or joint ventures with other companies, without the threat of being sued by Intel for patent infringement, it said.

The FTC order is be subject to public comment for 30 days, until September 7, 2010, after which the Commission would decide whether to make it final.

 

Comments

 

Other News

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter