NASSCOM against internet gatekeepers

Differential pricing restricts the choice and the IT body for unfettered access

GN Bureau | January 4, 2016



Indian information technology industry body NASSCOM has urged the nation’s telecom regulator not to allow internet service providers and internet platforms to be the gatekeepers and sought an independent board on differential pricing.

NASSCOM president R Chandrasekhar has said that the consumer should have unfettered access to the internet and any differential pricing which restricts the choice should not be allowed.

NASSCOM finds Airtel Zero and Free Basics by Facebook unacceptable from the net neutrality point of view, Chandrasekhar said. He spoke to media while announcing industry body's response to TRAI's consultation paper on differential pricing for data services. It has submitted its response to TRAI (telecom regulatory authority of India).

NASSCOM has emphasised on the importance of net neutrality in fostering an ecosystem for innovation and start-ups.

“Differential pricing should not become a tool that facilitates market dominance or enables anti-competitive behavior by either TSP or platform provider. It should not offer direct or indirect commercial benefit including leveraging the value of customer data generated in the process,” said Sanjiv Bikhchandani, chairman, NASSCOM Internet Council.

“Further it should not offer lower prices for own or partner content/ service. Instead of differential pricing for select data services for wide access, transparent business models should be adopted without segmenting the internet or skewing competition,” Bikhchandani felt.

Chandrasekhar said “we strongly oppose any model where TSPs or their partners have a say or discretion in choosing content that is made available at favourable rates, speed etc."

“In our response we have highlighted that any large monopolization of access to vast data which has potential commercial value is detrimental to public interest, especially in absence of legislation on privacy,” he added.

Responding to Facebook's justification that app developers are welcome to join Free Basics provided they comply with technical specifications, Chandrasekhar said that it is Facebook which decides, oversees and monitors service that are to be accepted or rejected. This discretion can't be left to the ISPs or internet platforms like Facebook, he said.

For this, NASSCOM recommended establishment of an independent not-for-profit entity with an independent board, who would own and manage proposed differential pricing programs that intends to be in the public interest and are philanthropic in nature.

Noting that NASSCOM is not supporting complete ban on differential pricing, he stressed, if differential pricing has to be done, the conditions should be laid out by the regulator and not the ISP or its partners.

"We recognize that in India there is an obvious need for collective, concerted and focused efforts to enable relevant content, services or access and to overcome the digital divide. It is therefore important that the regulator should have the power to allow differential pricing for certain types/ classes of services that are deemed to be in public interest and based on mandatory prior approvals. Any such programs should abide by the principles of net neutrality and not constrain innovation in any way," he said.

Chandrasekhar said that NASSCOM supports services like GIGATO and mCENT which reimburse data for accessing partnering apps. The reimbursed data can be used by consumers to access any website.

Comments

 

Other News

Understanding Bharat’s history from its own perspective

Eminent Distorians: Twists and Truths in Bharat`s History By Utpal Kumar BluOne Ink, 334 pages

‘MAGA’ + ‘MIGA’ = ‘MEGA’ partnership for prosperity: Modi

Prime minister Narendra Modi has linked the dream of a Viksit Bharat with US president Donald Trump’s slogan, ‘Make America Great Again’, or ‘MAGA’, saying that when these two democracies work together, i.e. ‘MAGA’ plus ‘Make India Great Again’ (‘

ONOE: Anti-federalism or pro-reform?

The government`s move to implement ‘One Nation, One Election’ (ONOE) has ignited widespread debate. On one hand, it offers tangible benefits, such as removing the possibility of a governance paralysis and reducing election costs. On the other hand, the opposition and sections of civil society s

PM Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana completes first year

On February 13, 2025, the PM Surya Ghar: Muft Bijli Yojana (PMSGMBY) will mark its first anniversary, celebrating a year of empowering households with affordable solar energy and accelerating India’s transition to a sustainable future. Launched by prime minister Narendra Modi on Febru

How to leverage AI to solve urgent global issues

The world seems to be hurling towards World War III in all the possible scenarios: hot war, cold war, and proxy war. The battleground seems to have expanded beyond physical to digital or virtual/mixed reality with technology like drones. Moreover, the line between civilian and military targets seems to hav

Budget: Progress towards SDGs and areas for improvement

The Union Budget 2025-26 outlines India`s vision for economic and social growth while also reflecting the country`s commitment to sustainable development. As India moves closer to the 2030 deadline for the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), this budget presents a balanced approach

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter