AP govt sends strong reply to MoEF on Polavaram project

State principal secretary claims Rs 3,303 crore of expenditure has so far been incurred

PTI | November 11, 2010



Maintaining that the objections raised by union ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) over construction of the multi-purpose Polavaram irrigation project on river Godavari were "unfortunate", the Andhra Pradesh government on Wednesday gave a strong reply to the ministry's letter dated November 1.

Taking a serious view of the Andhra Pradesh government's inaction in conducting a public hearing into the construction of Polavaram project and obtaining a fresh environmental clearance, the MoEF had shot off a letter to the state seeking an explanation on the issue.

"There is no failure on part of the AP government in taking suitable action for conducting public hearing and hence, there is no reason for contemplating to issue any show-cause notice under Section-5 of the Environment (Protection) Act," state principal secretary (irrigation) Shailendra Kumar Joshi said in a 42-page reply sent to the union secretary, MoEF.

He urged the MoEF to accord its concurrence for construction of protective embankments along the rivers Sabari and Sileru without insisting on public hearing as there was no change in the scope of the project. Besides, flood protective bunds did not require environmental clearance as per the provisions of EIA Notification, 2006, he added.

Joshi blamed the governments of Orissa and Chhattisgarh for playing truant over the issue and, "for reasons best known to them", objecting to the project and not co-operating in conducting public hearings.

"Orissa and Chhattisgarh are not conducting public hearings in their respective states deliberately on flimsy grounds in spite of constant persuasion from government of Andhra Pradesh and MoEF," he added.

The present project proposal was strictly in accordance with the provisions of interstate agreements concluded among co-basin states and the Godavari Water Disputes Tribunal (GWDT) Award, 1980.

The Award stipulated that the central water commission (CWC), inter-alia, might determine the places and height of the embankments to be constructed in the states of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh) and Orissa to avoid submergence over a height of 150-ft due to backwater effect on account of the construction of Polavaram dam and "the state of Andhra Pradesh shall pay and bear the cost of construction and maintenance of all such necessary protective embankments," Joshi said, quoting the Award.

He said the Rs 16,000 crore Polavaram project benefited not only the regions of Andhra Pradesh but also neighbouring states of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Orissa and Chhattisgarh.

"The project works are in progress and about Rs 3,303 crore of expenditure has so far been incurred," he added.

Joshi also said that no work has commenced in respect of protective embankments in Orissa and Chhattisgarh states.

"The project works are in progress only in the areas where environmental clearance had already been given in 2005. Hence, there is no violation of any provisions under EIA Notification or Environment (Protection) Act," he asserted.

Urging the MoEF to accord necessary concurrence for constructing the embankments, he sought the ministry to "arrange for public hearings by engaging other agency at the earliest possible opportunity."

Comments

 

Other News

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter