CCI, SC raise the bar for builders with DLF fine

Builders feel the heat as supreme court asks DLF to deposit fine of Rs 630 crore imposed on it by CCI

pujab

Puja Bhattacharjee | August 28, 2014



With the supreme court order asking realty giant DLF to deposit the penalty imposed on it by the competition commission of India (CCI) for abusing its dominant position in the market, there is cause for the common man to rejoice. Competition commission of India, which was established to protect the interest of consumers besides ensuring fair trade practises had passed a ruling in favour of the hapless consumers when it fined DLF Rs 630 crore for abusing its dominant position in the market in 2011.

In May 2014, COMPAT had upheld the judgment and told DLF to either pay the fine within 60 days or approach the supreme court. The case relates to three DLF projects- Belaire, Park Place and Magnolias. The buyers had approached CCI alleging that DLF had added extra floors without informing them.

Amit Jain, a buyer of DLF Belaire had earlier told Governance Now that in spite of the CCI ruling; DLF had continued to escape paying the fine by constantly filing appeals. Though buyers had applauded the CCI and COMPAT judgments, they continued to remain sceptical as no major dent was made on DLF. But the supreme court order states that DLF has to deposit the entire fine along with the interest for the duration for which the amount had remained unpaid, before it hears its appeal.

According to a report in Mint, DLF is deep in debt and the order further enhances its burden. As of June, DLF had a debt of around Rs 18,500 crore and its shares fell 4.4 percent to Rs 183.05 on the Bombay stock exchange (BSE) after the supreme court direction.  DLF had sought six months' time to comply with the direction but the court asked it to deposit Rs 50 crore within three weeks and the rest Rs 580 crore in the next three months. In spite of the tight situation, DLF managed to put up a brave face and said that it had full faith in the merits of its appeal.

At a time when there has been an upsurge in the skirmishes between buyers and developers, the order becomes quite significant. In absence of a proper real estate regulation law, developers are free to impose their will and might on clueless buyers. Though local development authorities are empowered to take action against the builders, largely they have proved ineffective in containing their malpractices. But with this order and the recent order asking Supertech to refund home buyers along with interest, developers are beginning to feel the heat. For years, developers have exploited legal loopholes to harass homebuyers and escape justice. But these orders have restored faith in homebuyers that nobody is above the law.

 

Comments

 

Other News

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter