FDI decision aimed at distracting Parl: NDA

Sharma reaches out to MPs on FDI in multi-brand retail

PTI | November 28, 2011



BJP-led NDA on Monday accused the government of allowing FDI in retail with an aim of distracting and disrupting parliament which was set to discuss crucial issues of price rise and black money.

National Democratic Alliance (the centre-right coalition of political parties in India) convenor and Janta Dal (United) president Sharad Yadav and Bhartiya Janta Party spokesperson Shahnawaz Hussain said the question of allowing parliament to function does not arise till the government withdraws the decision on FDI.

They also charged that commerce minister Anand Sharma did not discuss the FDI issue with the opposition before going ahead with the plan.

"Anand Sharma has written to all that he has talked to the stakeholders before taking this decision. Who are these stakeholders. The government should have talked to the political parties," Yadav told reporters outside parliament house.

He alleged that if this policy is accepted, then traders will be adversely affected. It will also lead to escalation in unemployment problem in the country.

Asked if the opposition will allow parliament to function if the FDI decision remains in place, Yadav shot back, "The question does not arise."

"This is under a government plan not to allow parliament to function. They have allowed FDI at a juncture when the parliament was to discuss price rise and black money," Yadav said, adding that the decision was hurried through even though some of the cabinet ministers were opposed to the proposal.

NDA demanded that the FDI decision be withdrawn immediately.

"The entire opposition, other than Shiromani Akali Dal, is demanding that FDI policy should be withdrawn," Yadav said.

Hussain charged that due to the government bringing up the FDI issue, the price rise and black money issues have been pushed back

Meanwhile, in the face of stiff opposition in Parliament to FDI in retail, commerce and industry minister Anand Sharma sought to reach out to MPs and state chief ministers and appealed to them to rise above "petty" partisanship on the issue.

"I felt it is my duty to dispel some apprehensions expressed by certain political parties," he said in his letter to members of both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.

The letter was sent to senior BJP leaders Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley, CPI(M) Member of Parliament Sitaram Yechuri, CPI MP D Raja, RJD Party chief Lalu Prasad Yadav, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Odisha Chief Minister Navin Patnaik, among others.

The parties should rise above "petty" partisanship and strengthen Indian political systems, he said, adding that wide consultations were held before the decision was taken.

The government has come under attack on allowing 51 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) in the multi-brand retail sector dominated by small-size kirana stores to attract global giants like Walmart to open stores in India.

Both the Opposition and UPA allies Trinamool Congress and DMK have demanded a roll-back of the decision, which was taken by the Union Cabinet on November 24.

Sharma said, "In formulating this policy, we were conscious of the livelihood concerns of millions of small retailers."

Studies on the global experience with foreign investment in multi-brand retail revealed that even in developing countries such as China, Brazil, Argentina, Singapore, Indonesia and Thailand, local retailers have found innovative ways to co-exist with organised retail chains.

Sharma said the government was also mindful of ensuring food security for the poorest of the poor, retaining the first right to procurement of foodgrains. The first right would rest with the government public distribution system, he said.

On concerns over the predatory pricing that may be resorted to by multi-national retailers, he said the Competition Commission would ensure that such practices are scrutinised.

"I have specially discussed the matter with the Chairman of the Competition Commission to bring in a regulator... to ensure necessary checks and balances," he said.

Comments

 

Other News

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter