Feeding the hawk: Sharif’s gambit

The recently elected Nawaz Sharif government in Pakistan increased the allocation to the country’s Army despite other pressing needs of the citizens. Why did Sharif do it and what could it mean for India?

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | June 15, 2013



In Pakistan, the energy crisis is near-debilitating. So much so, that some citizens live virtually in the dark ages. Power is hardly there in normal hours, let alone the peak hours. Long power cuts are routine. So, inevitably, the ‘powerless’ citizens’ anger was reflected in the recently concluded national elections in the country. Pakistan chose the Pakistan Muslim League (Nawaz) or PML (N). Nawaz Sharif, who became the newest democratically elected premier of the country, had successfully harnessed this anger in his electorate before the polls, giving the impression that his government would work towards solving Pakistan’s energy crisis.

But the defining demagoguery of South Asian politicians has always been thus — promise something but do a volte face once in power. Remember, the power problem was THE priority for the government. But, it has chosen to push money into defence instead, hiking the latter’s budget by 15 percent for the current fiscal. Guns and bullets over electricity, that’s what it chose. Now, citizens have to live in the dark while the newest guns fire the newest bullet somewhere at its borders.

The amount from the government coffers earmarked for defence for 2013 now stands at Pakistani Rs (PR) 627.2 billion, an increase of PR 82 billion over last year. The army has yet again cornered the major chunk of this allotment receiving PR 301.54 billion, followed by the air force which got PR 131.18 billion and the navy which got Rs 62.8 billion. At the same time, the country’s energy sector (including all sources) is burdened with an outstanding debt of $5 billion (a little over PR 492 billion)!

With the skewed budgeting, the Sharif government has sent out a clear message: it won’t antagonize the army. In his campaign, Sharif had been outspoken against the army, remembering well his ouster in October 1999 in a bloodless coup led by General Pervez Musharraf.  With the army’s influence in Islamabad showing little sign of waning, Sharif cannot afford to take it head on. Also, a day after the budget was announced, Musharraf was arrested in a murder case — something that would not have sat well with the armed establishment. So, whichever concern it was that forced Sharif’s hand — keeping the army away from Islamabad or placating ruffled feathers — it is clear that the Pakistani government chose a policy of appeasement.

The army is fighting a difficult battle with the Taliban militia in the northern tribal regions of the country. Analysts see a justification of the allocation in the expenses that are associated with such military operations.

But what message has Pakistan sent out to its neigbours. For India, the signal from across the border is not promising in the littlest bit. India was hoping that Sharif would stick to pre-poll position of improving bi-lateral relations. But the hike for the army only means that Sharif stands behind an establishment that is hawkish when it comes to us. Besides, Islamabad has always been accused by India of diverting funds that are earmarked for the insurgeny at the Afghan border to its Kahsmir machinations. So, why should it be different this time around? There is little guarantee that hostilities between the two countries will not flare up with the increased budget allocation for the Pakistani defence.

In Nawaz Sharif, New Delhi saw an ‘honest’ politician who wanted to improve Indo-Pak relations. After all, Sharif and former Indian prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee were the architects of the Delhi-Lahore bus route as a peace initiative. But then, Kargil happened and hands were pulled bank mid-handshake.
Fourteen years after the Kargil misadventure, with a historic mandate, Sharif had a chance to mend fences. But, like always, the opportunity was frittered away with the proverbial slip between the cup and the lip. The hike in Pakistan’s defence budget shows that New Delhi will have to be careful and do a lot of soul-searching with its neigbour.

Comments

 

Other News

Caring for cancer patients: the expanded network of facilities

Health is a State subject, and the primary responsibility for providing healthcare services, including cancer care, rests with the respective state governments. However, the Department of Health and Family Welfare provides technical and financial support to States and Union Territories across the country

Capabilities, aspirations of India’s youth limitless: Modi

The capabilities and aspirations of India’s youth are limitless, prime minister Narendra Modi said in his remarks to the media at the start of monsoon session of the parliament on Monday.  "In the past month, the country has achieved many milestones, filling citiz

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter