Focus on projects, not industries for economic inclusion, say activists

GDP led growth is a flawed model, insist civil society voices

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | October 20, 2010



India's much-celebrated economic growth has not trickled down to the poor who continue to stay deprived of the most fundamental needs - foof, sustainable employment, shelter, health and education, say civil society groups.

Shifting focus from a solely 'industry-oriented' approach to a more integrated 'project-oriented' one could trigger economic inclusion, agreed the attendees at a seminar organised here by the 'Forum for Promoting Inclusive Growth.'

“GDP based growth model is a flawed model. It only helps few rich people,” said Prashant Bhushan, senior Supreme Court lawyer and activist.

Pointing out that two-third ore mined from tribal and forest areas is exported, Bhusan said, “To promote this export-led growth, lands have been taken from poor people without properly compensating them.”

“You can’t take land without the consent of gram sabha. There is a need to rethink by looking at all the important aspect of it,” he added.

Rehabilitation and resettlement need to precede land acquistion for industrial activities, noted agro-economist Krishna R. Chowdry stressed at the seminar. The activists held that the present pace of urbanisation was eating into agricultural land in the country, depriving entire farming communities of their livelihood.

“There is an absolute culture of corporate greed in the country,” said Sujato Bhadro, senior civil rights activist. “In Brazil, Mexico – citizens have right to participate in official policies but in India it is missing,” he added saying that benefits have to be shared with the land owners/users.

The speakers stressed on the need for an alternate development model for the country. The seminar was organised with help from the industrialists interested in gauging the civil society poistion on industry-led development.

The industrialists blamed the government for the sorry state of affair. “The government is not able to check the corruption that’s why we have to shell out 30 to 40 percent of bribe in getting any project,” admitted M Krishna Prasad, secretary, Forum for Promoting Inclusive Growth and an industrialist.

He said that there is a perception and assumption that the state is run by industrialists, which he saidis not true. “Governance is the issue of state not industrialists.”

However, Prasad added that there is need for peaceful inclusive development of the country. “Unless a phased programme of new development policies are formulated and initiated the problem of unemployment and hunger is going to haunt us with even more severity,” he said.

Comments

 

Other News

Former president Ram Nath Kovind on some of his unforgettable journeys

Triumph of the Indian Republic: My Life, My Struggles By Ram Nath Kovind Rupa Publications, 400 pages, Rs 795   All our presidents so far stand out, each for a different reason. Ram Nath Kovind, the 14th president of India, from 2017 t

Uday Kotak on history, Indian economy, growth and more

Pathbreakers: How 10 Visionary Leaders Transformed India by award-winning journalists  By Sucheta Dalal and Debashis Basu Rupa Publications, 304 pages, Rs 695  

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter