Look who’s bleating! PMO ignores its own indictment

The common man in the street, meanwhile, wonders how PMO is more powerful than the PM in certain matters

akash

Akash Deep Ashok | February 1, 2012




“…the sheep developed a great liking for this maxim, and often as they lay in the field they would all start bleating “Four legs good, two legs bad! Four legs good, two legs bad!” and keep it up for hours on end, never growing tired of it.”

The sheep in George Orwell’s allegorical masterpiece have been a subject of massive academic research. Their impromptu bouts of bleating and adherence to simplistic slogans and repetition — which occur throughout the novella — seem to destroy any possibility of independent thought among the animals. At strategic times, when all other animals of the Manor Farm struggle to come to terms with sudden and shocking changes in the policy, sheep’s incessant and mindless bleating closes the possibility of a question and gives the change a legitimacy. In fiction, situations often necessitate absurdities and grotesqueness.

In the life of a nation, however, mindless bleating is plain mindless bleating. And when it is from the prime minister’s office, the PMO, and not the bleating, takes an exclamation mark. When the supreme court in a landmark judgment on Tuesday said that Subramanian Swamy had the locus standi to seek sanction to prosecute A Raja in 2G scam and squarely blamed PMO for sitting over Swamy’s plea to PM Manmohan Singh, all PMO did was bursting into a mindless bleating.

“We welcome the fact that both the learned judges (justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly) have completely vindicated the prime minister while appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” a statement from the PMO said. This statement is bizarre if not brazen. Jurists believe the court has taken a fine line to respect the sanctity of a constitutional institution (the PM’s) while also driving home the point about lapses caused at his end. And even if the court (actually) vindicated the PM, it rapped the PMO over the knuckles for its failures.

“Unfortunately, those who were expected to give proper advice to Respondent No. 1 (the PM) and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so,” the judgment read. The common man in the street, meanwhile, wonders as to how the PMO becomes more powerful than the PM in certain matters. And if indeed so, then who does lead whom? More strangely, when reprimanded by the country’s apex court, how can the PMO brazenly issue a statement welcoming the fact that the PM has been vindicated? Mindless bleating.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter