Look who’s bleating! PMO ignores its own indictment

The common man in the street, meanwhile, wonders how PMO is more powerful than the PM in certain matters

akash

Akash Deep Ashok | February 1, 2012




“…the sheep developed a great liking for this maxim, and often as they lay in the field they would all start bleating “Four legs good, two legs bad! Four legs good, two legs bad!” and keep it up for hours on end, never growing tired of it.”

The sheep in George Orwell’s allegorical masterpiece have been a subject of massive academic research. Their impromptu bouts of bleating and adherence to simplistic slogans and repetition — which occur throughout the novella — seem to destroy any possibility of independent thought among the animals. At strategic times, when all other animals of the Manor Farm struggle to come to terms with sudden and shocking changes in the policy, sheep’s incessant and mindless bleating closes the possibility of a question and gives the change a legitimacy. In fiction, situations often necessitate absurdities and grotesqueness.

In the life of a nation, however, mindless bleating is plain mindless bleating. And when it is from the prime minister’s office, the PMO, and not the bleating, takes an exclamation mark. When the supreme court in a landmark judgment on Tuesday said that Subramanian Swamy had the locus standi to seek sanction to prosecute A Raja in 2G scam and squarely blamed PMO for sitting over Swamy’s plea to PM Manmohan Singh, all PMO did was bursting into a mindless bleating.

“We welcome the fact that both the learned judges (justices GS Singhvi and AK Ganguly) have completely vindicated the prime minister while appreciating the onerous duties of his office,” a statement from the PMO said. This statement is bizarre if not brazen. Jurists believe the court has taken a fine line to respect the sanctity of a constitutional institution (the PM’s) while also driving home the point about lapses caused at his end. And even if the court (actually) vindicated the PM, it rapped the PMO over the knuckles for its failures.

“Unfortunately, those who were expected to give proper advice to Respondent No. 1 (the PM) and place full facts and legal position before him failed to do so,” the judgment read. The common man in the street, meanwhile, wonders as to how the PMO becomes more powerful than the PM in certain matters. And if indeed so, then who does lead whom? More strangely, when reprimanded by the country’s apex court, how can the PMO brazenly issue a statement welcoming the fact that the PM has been vindicated? Mindless bleating.
 

Comments

 

Other News

How social media is reshaping elections

Since Brazil’s return to direct presidential elections in 1985, no candidate who finished second in the first round of polling had ever won the presidency. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, now 81, has just done it. What explains the comeback, and what changed in Brazilian politics to make it possi

Cabinet approves Dearness Allowance, Dearness Relief

The union cabinet chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday approved the release of an additional instalment of Dearness Allowance (DA) to central government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners with effect from 01.07.2026 representing an increase of 3% over the existing rates of 6

Cyclone Arnab strikes Andhra as warming oceans amplify storm risks

Cyclone Arnab made landfall along the Andhra Pradesh and Yanam coasts in the early hours of Wednesday as a very severe cyclonic storm, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 125–135 kmph and gusts reaching 150 kmph. Its rapid intensification has raised concerns about how warmer oceans, global warmin

Counting matters but which ones?

The first instinct of public policy is to count. Its harder task is to count what counts. We have become remarkably good at measuring the reach of the welfare state vis-à-vis beneficiaries covered, rupees transferred, houses built, connections installed and services delivered. But some of the most

Inching closer to a trade deal with America

The cooperation between India and the United States goes back quite a time. We need to relegate that era to the backburner when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited US in the times of president Dwight Eisenhower and called the American let-off of 10 million dollars in defence aid to Pakistan as a “gun w

Manch vs Musk: Forty people and a foreign billionaire

About forty people walked the roundabout on Teen Murti Marg to the gate of Chanakyapuri police station, a distance you could cover in under a minute, on Friday to protest against Elon Musk’s Starlink. The walk was called by the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. Nobody joined them on the way, and nobody seeme

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter