Maoists top violators of human rights in India - report

Human rights research study says Maoists top violators, blames state for acting against perpetrators of human rights violations

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | April 14, 2010



Among all insurgent groups in India, the Maoists are the worst violators of human rights, says a study. “The Maoists have been responsible for brutal killing of their hostages after abduction,” the report further adds.

The report was released on Tuesday by the Asian Centre for Human Rights, a New Delhi based human rights watchdog. It further says that killing and extortion by the Maoists are done with the blessings of its top leaders.

According to the report titled ‘Torture in India, 2010,’ “the Maoists have been responsible for brutal killing by slitting throats of the hostages or beheading them.” It says that killings are generally authorised in the ‘people’s courts or Jan Adalats run by the Maoists to give justice to its own people.

The report highlights that there has been rise of such torture by the Maoists from 2000 to 2008. “The Maoists specially target civilians on the allegation of being “police informers”, members of the anti-Maoist civilian militia such as “Salwa Judum” and for not obeying their diktats,” the report points out.

The report has cited at least 17 examples of Maoists killing civilians, including the 4 September, 2009 slaughter of four villagers in Bijapur of Chhattisgarh on suspicion of being police informers. Calling this a blatant disregard for the international humanitarian law committed by the Maoists, the report, however, also blamed the government for “failing in its efforts to hold perpetrators of abuses accountable for their actions, whether committed by the state, the Maoists or other armed opposition groups.”  

The report came a week after the Maoists ambushed a Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) team which left around 76 soldiers dead in deep in the jungles of Chattisgarh’s Dantewada district.

Comments

 

Other News

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter