More harm than good

Congress leader not attending a meeting on Lokpal will cause more delay in its appointment

GN Bureau | March 1, 2018


#Lokpal   #Congress   #Mallikarjun Kharge   #Narendra Modi  
Illustration: Ashish Asthana
Illustration: Ashish Asthana

Mallikarjun Kharge, leader of the Congress in the Lok Sabha, has opted out of a meeting on the appointment of the Lokpal, a move that may end up further delaying the process for the country getting an anti-corruption watchdog.

Kharge has written to prime minister Narendra Modi stating that he will not be attending the meeting on the appointment of a Lokpal wherein he has been invited as a ‘special invitee’.

“The special invitee invitation is a concerted effort to exclude the independent voice of the opposition altogether from the selection process of the most important anti-corruption watchdog,” Kharge said in his letter, reported Indian Express.

He also questioned the government as to why the appointment has been delayed for four years.

However, not participating in the meeting will give an opportunity to the government to say that the opposition had not taken part in the process, delaying the appointment.

The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 was passed during the term of the Congress-led UPA and it came into force on January 16, 2014. Since then there has been no headway even as the term of the NDA government is drawing to a close, with the general elections expected to take place in 2019, if not earlier.

Even the Supreme Court had taken the government to task for the delay in appointing the country’s first anti-corruption ombudsman.

On November 23, 2016, the apex court asked why the government was dragging its feet if it was “so committed to cleansing corruption.”

The Lokpal issue is currently stuck on who should be on the appointment panel.

“Don’t allow Lokpal to become a dead letter,” a bench headed by then chief justice TS Thakur told the government’s top prosecutor, reported Hindustan Times.

“When you say the government is committed to cleansing corruption, then this (Lokpal) is the step in the right direction. Why should there be a feeling government is dragging the feet?”, it added.

It looks as if the situation in Delhi is similar to the situation in Gujarat where the Lokayukta too faced hiccups.

On Sep 3, 2013, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan said the Gujarat government, then led by Narendra Modi, has been against the transparency of the position of the Lokayukta in the state, and cited the events leading to Justice RA Mehta’s resignation from the position as an example.

 “For 10 years, Modi has not allowed a Lokayukta to be appointed in Gujarat. Justice Mehta was nominated by the chief justice but he fought this tooth and nail right up to the Supreme Court, filing a review petition and then a curative petition. Eventually, Justice Mehta resigned in frustration,” Bhushan said, reported DNA.

“Now, Modi has amended the Lokayukta Act of Gujarat in a manner to make the Lokayukta totally useless. Now, the Lokayukta will be appointed essentially by the government. The Lokayukta will have no power of investigation against anybody who the government does not want him to investigate,” he added.


 

Comments

 

Other News

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter