No uniformity in state and centre RTE rules

Rules in states don't define EWS and disadvantaged groups; have no proper grievance redressal system

jasleen

Jasleen Kaur | April 27, 2012



Even after two year of implementation of the Right to Education act, some states are yet to make rules. And those who have made rules, are not in uniformity with the model rules prepared by the centre.

Andhra Pradesh’s and Arunachal Pradesh’s state rules fail to mention that children can be admitted anytime in an academic year as the acts says. The RTE act has done away with exams up to class 8 but calls for continuous comprehensive evaluation. This is not reflected in the rules of Andhra Pradesh. Instead, children have been grouped into two categories depending on those who secure high marks and ones with least marks.

The Model Rules, 2009 on the right to education act were formulated by the ministry of HRD to operationalise the Act. These rules provided a broad framework which states could use while devising their own state rules on RTE. But the national commission for protection of child rights (NCPCR) has found that many states have not formed rules in accordance with the model rules.

School management committee (SMC) is one of the important elements in the act. The committee, comprising parents, teacher and students, has the responsibility to make the school development plan.

In many states, there is a clear violation on this front. Like in Andhra, rules want the parents of children who secured highest marks and least marks to be candidates for school management committee.

Madhya Pradesh’s rules say mother and father of each child who secured highest percentage in the annual examination of the preceding academic session will be members of SMCs.

Under the RTE act, children from economically weaker and disadvantaged section have the right to education. But rules of some states like Tamil Nadu fail to define them. Assam also has not specified the EWS and disadvantaged groups. And nowhere in the rules does it specifically say that 25% seats have to be reserved for children from EWS in private schools, as required under the act.

In Rajasthan, rules say that class-wise names of children from economically weaker section in private schools will be displayed.

In Madhya Pradesh, the government had to calculate the per child expenditure within three months after the commencement of the act but the per child expenditure still remains pending.

In Maharashtra, rules include only blind children under disadvantaged section. Other disabilities have been left out.

In Orissa, rules do not specify what appropriate and safe arrangements will be made to ensure children with disabilities attend school.

The model rules do not include mechanisms of grievance redressal and the NCPCR is working on formulating them. But states must ensure their RTE rules include all aspects of grievance redressal, including the method of lodging complaints, specific authorities from the state machinery to be approached for complaints and timeline for grievance redressal. Most states fail to do so.

In some states like Manipur and Sikkim, grievance redressal system only addresses concerns of teachers and not the children. In West Bengal, teacher’s accountability to SMC has not been established.

In Delhi, which is yet to notify its rules, the grievance redressal mechanism has not been defined. Delhi commission for protection of child rights have set up a helpline to receive complaints but there is no institutionalised mechanism to resolve these complaints.

Comments

 

Other News

Modi wave, it seems, shows no signs of stopping

The voters’ trust in Brand Modi is not a short-term affair – if anything, it is only increasing, or so it seems going by the numbers exit polls have given after the Maharashtra and Haryana assembly elections. Predictions from three TV channels differ widely but each has the BJP/NDA in the top p

All you wanted to know about Maharashtra, Haryana elections

Fact Sheet: Maharashtra assembly elections * Date of polling: 21 October * Date of counting 24 October * Assembly Constituencies: 288 * 2014 results: The BJP contested 260 states, and won 122, with a voting percentage of

Manmohan Singh favours ‘time-tested measures’ for economy

The much hyped ‘double engine’ model of governance on which the BJP is seeking votes has utterly failed, and Mumbai and Maharashtra have had to face some of the worst effects of economic slowdown, former prime minister Manmohan Singh has said. A lot of problems facing Maharashtra

“If the oppn is weak you can’t blame the govt for that”

A three-term Rajya Sabha member, Sanjay Raut is the Shiv Sena spokesperson and its voice in parliament. He is also the executive editor of Marathi newspaper Samana, started by Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray. Raut spoke with Geetanjali Minhas on his party’s seat-sharing agreement

Ashish Shelar of BJP says, “We are very confident of victory”

Ashish Shelar, 47, was the president of the Mumbai city unit of the BJP, before he became the minister of school education, sports and youth welfare in the Maharashta government this year. He has represented the Vandre West constituency in the state assembly and seeking re-election. In a chat with

Nobel for economics goes to `global fight against poverty`

The Nobel Prize in economics for 2019 goes to Abhijit Banerjee, Esther Duflo and Michael Kremer "for their experimental approach to alleviating global poverty." The prize, known as “The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel”, was announc



Archives

Current Issue

Video

CM Nitish’s convoy attacked in Buxar

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter