Organic farming a profitable venture: Greenpeace

Farmers are more vulnerable to financial distress due to high costs in growing genetically engineered (GE) variety

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | June 16, 2010



Cultivating organic cotton gives higher financial security to farmers over the cultivation of Bt cotton, says a Greenpeace report.

The report said that in the year 2009-10 farmers in the South India cultivating cotton through organic practices earned 200 percent more net income than farmers who grew Genetically Engineered cotton (Bt cotton).

According to report ‘in the region of Andhra Pradesh the cost of cultivation is much higher for Bt cotton farmers. The Bt cotton farmers incurred 65 percent higher debt –accumulated during 2008/09 and 2009/10– than the non-Bt organic cotton farmers.’

“Our study illustrates how farmers growing GE cotton face high debts and high costs of cultivation, becoming more vulnerable to financial collapses,” said Dr Reyes Tirado, Scientist, Greenpeace International, who authored the report.

The report released on Tuesday titled ‘Picking Cotton - The choice between organic and genetically-engineered cotton for farmers in South India’ said genetically engineered (GE) variety makes farmers more vulnerable to financial collapse due to high debts and increased costs of cultivation.

“Bt cotton has only benefitted the multinational seed giants like Monsanto who has earned 1580 crore Rupees as royalty from its patented Bt cotton seed since its release” said Rajesh Krishnan, sustainable agriculture campaigner with Greenpeace India. “Cotton farming that uses ecological practices and avoids genetically engineered seeds and agrochemicals is the most beneficial for Indian farmers,” he further added.

Greenpeace has demanded that the Indian government ban Bt cotton cultivation and asked the government to take an active role in supplying sufficient quantities of quality non-Bt seeds and support organic cotton farming. The international environmental NGO had spearheaded the opposition to the introduction of Bt brinjal in India.

“It is preposterous that on the one hand government doles out thousands of crores in the name of bringing relief to farmers while on the other they permit and promote Bt cotton cultivation and ensure that the farmer can never escape the debt treadmill.” said Dr G.V Ramanjaneyalu, Executive Director of Centre for Sustainable Agriculture.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter