PMO denies information on 2G scam

Citing breach of parliamentary privilege

PTI | November 3, 2011



Mired in controversies, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) in India has declined to disclose information related to 2G spectrum allocation issue citing breach of parliamentary privilege.

Replying to an RTI query by advocate Vivek Garg, the PMO said since the issues relating to the allocation of second generation spectrum is being looked into by Parliamentary Committees, the information cannot be made public.

The surfacing of a 2G note of the finance ministry on the basis of an RTI query filed by Garg had caused crises in the government in September. The finance ministry note written on March 25, 2011 had said that the then finance minister of India P Chidambaram could have avoided the scam had he insisted on auctioning of spectrum.

"Papers and records on the issue have been requisitioned by these committees. Under Section 8 (1) (C) of the Right to Information Act, such information, the disclosure in terms of Rule 275 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha (lower House of Indian Parliament) evidence given before a parliamentary committee shall not be published until it has been laid on the Table in Indian Parliament.

"Therefore, papers constituting evidence given to a Parliamentary Committee whose report is yet to be tabled are exempt from the disclosure," the Central Public Information Officer of the PMO said in reply to an RTI application filed by Garg.

Section 8 (1) (c) bars "information, the disclosure of which would cause a breach of privilege of parliament or the state legislature".

Exercising his Right to information, Garg had sought details of communications relating to 2G spectrum sale between the PMO and other concerned ministries.

"It is a setback to transparency law. The PMO has wrongfully denied information. I have filed an appeal over the denial," Garg said.

Both the public accounts committee and joint parliamentary committee are looking into several allegations of corruption and irregularities in the allocation of second generation spectrum to certain telecom companies in 2008.

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter