Retrospective clause in the land acquisition bill will be done away with: Jairam

Market dictates need for an investor-friendly bill, says the minister

GN Bureau | August 14, 2012




The current gloomy market scenario dictates the need for a more “investor-friendly” land acquisition bill, the rural development minister Jairam Ramesh said here on Monday.

Elaborating on the more “investor-friendly” bill, he said, the new amended bill would do away with the retrospective clause and replace it with the prospective clause. "My original position was to apply the Act retrospectively. I have changed that view now. If economy was growing at nine percent a year really, I may not have changed my view. But current economic circumstances dictate that the Act should do away with the retrospective clause,” he said.

The draft Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill (LARR) 2011 has gone through several changes ever since Ramesh unveiled it last year.

One of the important clauses introduced in the revised bill in August last year was the retrospective clause.  

The clause in the earlier bill said the Act would be applicable to all cases of land acquisition before the date of commencement of the act if the award under the 1894 Act had not been made. It would also be applicable if the possession of the land had not been taken regardless of whether the award had been made or not.

What it meant is that the clause would bring cases where the award of land was underway or possession had not taken place within the scope of compensatory and acquisition norms.

This clause had come in for flak from industry then as it meant the new compensatory and acquisition norms would escalate the cost manifolds.

The Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2011 was introduced in parliament in September last year and was referred to a parliamentary standing committee, which submitted its recommendation in May this year.

It is likely to be rechristened as the Right to Compensation, Resettlement, Rehabilitation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Bill.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter