Time we got our jollies

The apex court’s refusal to stay the film’s release and his logic must apply to all such petitions seeking a ban on works of art

akash

Akash Deep Ashok | March 16, 2013




Justice RM Lodha of supreme court set a beautiful example on Friday by telling a group of lawyers who had objected to the release of the film Jolly LLB that they should not watch the film if it offends them so much.  

The lawyers had moved court claiming the film showed their profession in poor light and thus sought a stay on its release.

The film’s trailers had shown the protagonist, Jagdish Tyagi a.k.a. Jolly LLB (played by Arshad Warsi), a struggling lawyer from Meerut, getting a rap from a judge (Saurabh Shukla) for misspelling prosecution as prostitution and appeal as apples. A group of Meerut lawyers approached the apex court against the Delhi high court's refusal to stay the film’s release, contending that the movie was defamatory to the legal fraternity.

Quoting Shakespeare’s Measure For Measure (“the first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers”), justice Lodha said, “We are not using those words here but you don't have to bother about everything.”

“If the movie is useless in your opinion, don't watch it. You know you will not enjoy it, so don't go. You are giving undue importance to the issue. Let those go to theatres who want to watch it,” he concluded.

Justice Lodha’s words must serve as a guiding principle for judges hearing petitions against books, films and songs, which have of late become so numerous across the country that it almost heralds the end of humour and tolerance for others’ viewpoints. It is impossible to think of a movie release these days without a lawsuit against it. In fact, the absence of a lawsuit is a cause for worry and forces moviegoers to look askance at its makers.

Ditto with books.

That brings us to the basic question: are we losing our sense of humour/tolerance? A people without a sense of humour would be like a bower reduced to stumps — where everybody would be cranky and unable to take or crack a joke. And this would give us a world very, very different from what we inherited.

Coming back to the movie in question, which I watched on the day of release itself, it is not, curiously, the lawyers who have been the butt of the crudest jokes in the film: it is the judge (played by Saurabh Shukla) who has been shown breaking wind noisily in the middle of slurping his tiffin clumsily in his chamber and trying to pacify the two lawyers (Arshad Warsi and Boman Irani) who had a quarrel in the courtroom a while before.

On one occasion, the judge calls the lawyer (Boman) close to him in the courtroom and belches right in his face before he could say anything.  

So, lawyers, better get your jollies and go enjoy the flick.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter