Creation of ‘good bank’ as important as ‘bad bank’ for NPA management

NARCL along with a development financial institution or development bank can help address both stock and flow of NPAs in banking

Hari Hara Mishra | September 20, 2021


#good bank   #bad bank   #NARCL   #NPA   #finance   #Banking   #infrastructure   #finance ministry  
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman (File photo) announced the cabinet had cleared the `bad bank` proposal last week.
Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman (File photo) announced the cabinet had cleared the `bad bank` proposal last week.

After the recent announcement of the government guarantee for Security Receipts (SRs) to be issued by a public sector-owned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), there is a surge of interest around this desi version of a super bad bank. The entity will acquire around ₹2 trillion bad debts from banks (which is around 25% of estimated ₹8.34 trillion of bad debts outstanding as of March 2021). From the immediate balance-sheet perspective of the banks, it is a big positive. Since most of the lenders will be doing it simultaneously, debt aggregation which used be a challenge and faced delayed resolution, gets addressed. The assets so acquired will be managed by a private sector professional entity called India Debt Resolution Corporation Ltd (IDRCL). Public sector ARC, private sector professional management and add backstop support of government guaranteeing the redemption of the payments notes issued by NARCL called SRs, everybody is gung-ho. And to a considerable extent, rightly so.

Also read:
All you wanted to know about 'bad bank'

Let us dive a little deeper. NARCL is a one-time exercise to acquire ₹2 trillion debt and resolve it in a five-year time frame. The entity will flush out NPAs of ₹2 trillion from banking system . Is it unique? Well, as per RBI data, the existing ARCs had acquired debts with book value of ₹2.38 trillion as of June 2016 which went up to ₹4.31 trillion as on 2020. In other words, in the last four years existing ARCs did flush out around ₹2 trillion from the banking system. It was not one time and hence there was no big- bang around it. For acquiring  this nearly ₹2 trillion NPAs, ARCs issued SRs amounting ₹0.72 trillion, at an average pricing of 36%. The cash component paid upfront by ARCs in this was ₹0.18 trillion, i.e., 25% of purchase consideration. NARCL proposes to acquire the assets at an average pricing of 18% with 15% upfront cash. NARCL does get a headstart with aggregated debt acquisition and much greater access to distressed debt market with government guaranteed papers. However, the creation of two entities, NARCL and IDRCL, may have its own issues around duality in structure.

Now the more pertinent question. NPA is both a stock at any given time and flow during a period. Flow is determined by net NPA accretion reduced by the amount recovered. NARCL or the existing ARCs help in reducing stock. What about flow? Just to give a perspective, in a three-year time-frame, from 2017-18 to 2019-20, banks added NPAs of ₹12.97 trillion, recovered ₹4.64 trillion and wrote off ₹6.37 trillion. During 2020-21, there would have been expected improvement which can be analysed after the ‘Trend and Progress of Banking’ report 2021 is available.

The fact remains that the flow of NPAs, and accretion of fresh NPAs is an equal, if not bigger, problem vis-à-vis the problem of NPA stocks. NARCL takes care of latter. But equal focus has to be on ensuring that incremental flow is addressed possibly by improving credit underwriting, may be with  an aggregated due diligence and documentation for parity in  rigour of skillsets in credit origination and follow-up.

Budget 2021 also mentioned setting up of a ‘good bank’, a development financial institution (DFI) for the funding of the national infrastructure pipeline. An amount of ₹20,000 crore has been budgeted this year. The problem of NPAs in banks is very much contributed by weathering out of all DFIs like ICICI, IDBI and IFCI, and the result was that the banks with short-term liability had to invest in long-term project loans with additional regulatory and execution risks. Once that is taken care of, hopefully NPA accretion will come down.

A ‘bad bank’ (NARCL) complemented with a ‘good bank’ (DFI) can help address both the stock and flow of NPAs in banking.

Mishra is a policy analyst and columnist.

Comments

 

Other News

Garib Kalyan Ann Yojana extended for three more months

In pursuance of the pro-people announcement made by the prime minister in 2021 and successful implementation of additional food security under PM Garib Kalyan Ann Yojana, the union cabinet has approved its extension for a further period of three months, from October to December 2022. At a ti

A great literary feast (that could’ve been even more sumptuous)

A Case of Indian Marvels: Dazzling Stories from the Country’s Finest Writers Edited by David Davidar Aleph, 390 pages, Rs 999 Change is the only constant, and India has always been doing so. Yet, after independence, if there was a year when the p

Govt e-Marketplace sellers report more business

“My volume of business has increased ever since I registered on GeM (Government e-Marketplace) in 2017. Earlier, I could supply items only in the vicinity of my shop in Fort area and only within Mumbai. Now, I ship my products all over the country! I have tied up with India Post and three private cou

How the Hindi Newspaper Business Changed

The Journey of Hindi Language Journalism in India: From Raj to Swaraj and Beyond By Mrinal Pande Orient BlackSwan, 188 pages, Rs 1,195.00 In India, the English-language media is considered the ‘national media’, while the language press

More reforms in telecom sector in offing: Ashwini Vaishnaw

The telecom sector in the country will witness more reforms in the coming years, minister for communications, electronics & IT and railways Ashwini Vaishnaw has said. He also asserted that the industry too will have to do its bit and reciprocate by improving quality of service significantly.

Left-wing extremism: challenges and response

Left-wing extremism is in existence right from India’s independence, but it became prominent in 1967 under the name of Naxalism. The nomenclature of this movement has changed from time to time and place to place depending upon the leadership. Before 2014 more than 15 states were facing this problem w

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter