Modi the magician or a great thief of a good idea?

bvrao

BV Rao | April 19, 2010



This open-mouthed admiration for Lalit Modi as the whiz who made a business out of cricket is getting to me.

Of course, the IPL (Indian Premier League) is a money spinner and is giving the EPLs of the world a run for their money. But when we credit Lalit  Modi for this brilliant marriage of cricket, movie stars and the megabucks, we thrust greatness upon a man who is just a good idea-thief.

The BCCI (Board of Control for Cricket in India), the parent body of IPL, had almost a contemptuous outlook to T20 cricket till about the time that Zee's Shubhash Chandra came up with the Indian Cricket League (ICL) and Dhoni's greenhorns redefined cricket with the T20 World Cup win.

Chandra's revolt was squished like a mosquito by the BCCI. Players who signed up for ICL were banned from playing in the BCCI's tournaments such as Ranji, Duleep and Test cricket; ICL was denied access to decent stadiums (all of which belong to BCCI or its state affiliates) and BCCI used its cricketing clout to lean on boards of other countries to ban their players from signing up for ICL. The BCCI's retribution went as far as to terminate the pension benefits of Kapil Dev and all other ex-cricketers who showed the temerity to go with Chandra.

In the big bad world of business, it is a legitimate exercise to employ all means to protect your market share. You earn your spurs for extirpating competition. But when we give the BCCI the credit for using every monopoly trick in its bag to protect its market share, we forget that the BCCI is not a business conglomerate but a trust that conducts cricket on behalf of the people of this country. It does not pay taxes because it is not a business. BCCI's sole objective is to promote cricket in the country, not to be the sole agency to do that.

Well, anyway, having so brutally murdered ICL, Modi launched the IPL. Not one idea of his was original. Chandra's ICL gave city-names to its eight teams, so did Modi's IPL. Chandra's ICL had a high quotient of entertainment, so does Modi's IPL. Chandra's ICL had foreign stars (retired, because BCCI's foreign friends would not allow their players to lend credence to ICL), so does Modi's IPL.

Yes, the IPL has gotten where nobody imagined cricket could go, and the ICL was certainly not allowed to go. The scale to which it has grown in such a short while is stunning, but why should I believe it's all because of this one whizkid called Lalit Modi?

Cricket is a religion in India. Movie stars are gods. And BCCI is a goddamned monopoly. In this grand world run by markets and brands, even a lamp post in the BCCI could have launched the IPL and made it a success. At least then we would have been spared of a certain blue suit strutting about the country like he runs it,  just because he is such a brilliant copy-cat.

 

 

Comments

 

Other News

Food inflation: Not a macroeconomic statistic but a developmental indicator

India`s retail inflation shows a reassuring picture at first glance. According to the latest data, Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation edged up to 4.38% in June 2026 from 3.93% in May 2026, but continued to remain within the Reserve Bank of India`s (RBI) target band of 4% (+/- 2%). However, beneath this

Skin in the game or masterful market timing?

When a company founder opens their personal chequebook to buy shares in their own business, stock markets usually applaud. To the average retail investor, it feels like the ultimate vote of confidence, a sign that the people running the show have real skin in the game and believe brighter days are ahead.

India’s freedom struggle was shaped by wider Asian political thought

As we mark 80th anniversary of independence, ‘Asianism and the Fall of Empire’ (HarperCollins India) by historian Mithi Mukherjee offers a new perspective on Ind

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter