Sonia's NAC agenda

Her return to the body signals aam aadmi is under focus again

ajay

Ajay Singh | March 30, 2010



The Congress seems to have developed into a fine art the difficult practice of running two power centres. Ever since the party came back to power in 2004, there was hardly any doubt that Sonia Gandhi is the political boss but there came a time, especially during the nuclear deal and the first few months of UPA2 when it seemed like Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had a mind of his own, too.

Initially there was a lot of skepticism about the efficacy of this duality of power centres. But, after six years in governance, it can be safely surmised that the party has learnt to deal with this duality dexterously. This is the precise reason why Sonia Gandhi's re-appointment as chairperson of the National Advisory Council (NAC) will not raise much heat and dust.

In her earlier role as NAC chairperson which bestows on her cabinet status, Gandhi influenced the government’s policies in a major way. She can be justifiably credited with prompting the government to take concrete social initiatives and bringing in the Right to Information Act to ensure transparency in governance.

It was the NAC that also came up with NREGA as the ultimate flagship programme for poverty eradication. The success of the Congress in 2009 elections was largely attributed to  successful implementation of this programme.

As of now, Gandhi’s reappointment as NAC chief (she had to quit earlier because of the office-of-profit problem which has since been taken care of) is just a technicality. Her overweening influence over the government was evident when she virtually pushed the agenda of the women’s reservation bill in spite of skepticism in some quarters. Her return as NAC head only implies that she is willing to play a proactive role in formulating and shaping the policies of governance. In her status as cabinet minister, she will be entitled to get access to government files and suggest measures which will be in consonance with her politics.

If at all there is some element of surprise, it is about why she chose to come back now. But even that is explained easily. Her party and government have come under for persistent attack of late for having abandoned the "aad aadmi" agenda. It is perhaps Gandhi's message to her political constituency that now that she is back, her social agenda will be back too.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter