Did India overreact in the Meera Shankar-patdown episode?

GN Bureau | December 10, 2010



Post 9/11, the airport security around the world changed - drastically so in the US. So, when the Indian ambassador to the US, Meera Shankar alighted at one in Mississippi last week, the US transport security administration personnel frisked her. And India, on Thursday, was livid, with external affairs minister S M Krishna terming the incident "unacceptable."

Shankar is a senior diplomat, an ambassador no less. It is reasonable to expect that as the host nation the US should do nothing to demean her position. India has extended security recuses to American VIPs and continues to do so. Hence, the anger at such a courtesy not being returned. But is this anger rational?

A decade after the most shocking terror attacks ever, the US has not seen another - big or small. Many credit it to the beefed up security measures the country has taken, with some going as far as championing the profiling at airports for security checks. Not that no one has been inconvenienced by the frisking. A US TV star who was recently put through a full-body scan at an airport claimed that the personnel singled her out because of her "attractive" looks. While such violating intrusions remain unpopular with some Americans, most believe that it is a necessary evil, as a recent poll indicates. Intrusive or not, the security checks could have deterred and prevented terror attacks.

On the other hand, attacks are like clockwork in India. Not that frisking American diplomats will bring the frequency down, but what is the sense in excluding them and expecting the US to do so? Is it not racial profiling, or worse, class profiling in its own way?

Immediately after the MEA expressed its outrage, the US secretary of state Hillary Clinton issued a statement saying that the US was "concerned" by the incident and would "review its policy". So, the patdown may not have violated any US protocol, to say the least. So, India, instead of armtwisting the US, should review its own policy of expemting VIPs, if all it seeks is egalitarian treatment from the US.

Diplomats enjoy a great deal of immunity in host nations, but are they to be excluded from patdowns at airports? Was India reaction over the frisking of Meera Shankar unwarranted?

Comments

 

Other News

Caring for cancer patients: the expanded network of facilities

Health is a State subject, and the primary responsibility for providing healthcare services, including cancer care, rests with the respective state governments. However, the Department of Health and Family Welfare provides technical and financial support to States and Union Territories across the country

Capabilities, aspirations of India’s youth limitless: Modi

The capabilities and aspirations of India’s youth are limitless, prime minister Narendra Modi said in his remarks to the media at the start of monsoon session of the parliament on Monday.  "In the past month, the country has achieved many milestones, filling citiz

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter