Should governors stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | July 14, 2010



Karnataka governor H R Bhardwaj created a flutter within the state government and the Bharatiya Janata Party that runs it when he called for removal of corrupt ministers indulging in illegal mining. The governor met the president in Delhi and later told the media that he had already taken up the issue with Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa. "I have told him you have appointed the ministers and you should take action. He says I need time. He doesn't say it is not happening," Mail Today newspaper quoted the governor as having said.

To be sure, the governor is not the first authority to have taken a stand against illegal mining in the state. Karnataka Lokayukta Justice N Santosh Hegde had exposed the extent of illegal mining in a voluminous report and had recently tendered his resignation because the state government had been blocking his efforts to punish the corrupt in this and other cases.

Interestingly, the BJP is not even attempting to defend the indefensible. It is only saying that the governor has no business to speak up on the issue and to demand the removal of Bellary's Reddy brothers who hold cabinet posts. In other words, it is saying that the highest constitutional authority should not intervene even in cases of blatant violation of public trust placed in members of the government that functions in his name. Not for the first time, the BJP's stand echoes the line taken by the Left Front government in West Bengal which had come under public criticism by then then governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi for its mishandling of the Singur crisis.

The question, therefore, arises, whether governors should stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance.

 

Comments

 

Other News

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Delhi moves to real-time traffic management

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, has approved implementation of the ITMS Project by Delhi Police at an estimated cost of Rs.1,789.52 crore, inclusive of taxes. The project will cover 42 identified traffic corridors and will be implemented in three

MDR on UPI: Can sustainability come without weakening the network?

The extraordinary transaction volumes and value (₹29.82 Lakh crore in August 2026 alone) of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have made it not only an Indian success story, but a global one. In 2024, UPI accounted for nearly 49% of the world’s real-time payment transaction volume, with more th

The Xi-Trump summit: The unending rivalry

Diplomacy is akin to an art, wherein the summitry, conflict resolution and negotiations form apt constituents of the entire context of deal making and “playing for keeps” in the international arena. The Xi-Trump summit in Washington last week, in which the American president broke all conside

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter