Shouldn't BCCI be nationalized?

GN Bureau | April 22, 2010



The BCCI is a society registered in 1928 under an obscure Tamil Nadu Society Registration Act of 1860 and still retains its colonial –era constitution which makes it a closely-held private club. Paradoxically, it runs the most popular sport and represents the country at international events. As a private body, it keeps its functioning and its balance sheet under wrap but as a public body it organizes cricket matches at state-built stadiums and gets security cover free of cost. It has enjoyed tax exemption saying that promoting cricket is a charitable work but it makes tons of money by selling telecast rights, advertisement space in stadiums and now, auctioning IPL teams for obscene sums. BCCI’s income for 2006-7, that is before IPL was launched, stood at Rs 247.86 crore but not a pie has been paid as tax.


As the IPL scam now reveals, big money has brought more opaqueness to BCCI’s functioning. No less than BCCI president Shashank Manohar says he has no idea who the real owners of various IPL franchises are. Much less is known about the source of money that has been put in to run these franchises. One of the BCCI board member and governing council member of IPL, N Srinivasan, actually runs a franchise but Manohar says there is no conflict of interest! BCCI’s “national selector” K Srikanth acts as an appendage of one particular IPL franchise but nobody even questions him.

Is this the way we want cricket to be run in this country? Should we leave administration of the game we are most passionate about to a private club run by a few individuals who are more passionate about their sweetheart deals? Shouldn’t we nationalize the body governing our most popular sport so that there is more accountability and more transparency in the way its functions and people have their more say?

 

Comments

 

Other News

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.”   No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter