FB founder wins case against Winklevoss twins

Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has won a case against two of his classmates who were trying to get more money from the social networking website chief by claiming he had stolen the idea of the project from them.

PTI | April 13, 2011



Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg has won a case against two of his classmates who were trying to get more money from the social networking website chief by claiming he had stolen the idea of the project from them.

The judge ruled that the 2008 settlement that gave USD 65 million to Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss in cash and stock still stands.

The twins had argued that the value of Facebook's stock was more than what Zuckerberg and his team let on.

"At some point, litigation must come to an end," Judge Alex Kozinski, of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in San Francisco, wrote in a unanimous three-judge decision. "That point has now been reached."

While Kozinski acknowledged the point raised by the twins, he said the plaintiffs and their lawyers "made a deal that appears quite favourable in light of recent market activity."

In the original suit filed in 2004, the rowing-twins and a third classmate, Divya Narendra, had said that Zuckerberg stole the Facebook idea from them, which was also dramatised in the hit film "The Social Network" last year.

"The Winklevosses are not the first parties bested by a competitor who then seek to gain through litigation what they were unable to achieve in the marketplace," the judge said.

"And the courts might have obliged, had the Winklevosses not settled their dispute and signed a release of all claims against Facebook," he added.

It is not clear yet whether the twins will take their case to the US Supreme Court.

Facebook is now valued at USD 50 billion, which is three times more than its value when the settlement was made.
 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter