ISPs approach Compat against DoT on Internet telephony

Alleges DoT delays on internet telephony to favour mobile operators

PTI | September 14, 2011



Internet service providers has approached the Competition Appellate Tribunal against the fair trade regulator CCI, which had rejected their plea, and alleged that DoT discriminated against them vis-a-vis the telecom operators by not allowing the the Internet telephony.

A petition by the Internet Service Providers Association of India (ISPAI) would be placed tomorrow before a three- member bench headed by tribunal Chairman Justice Arijit Pasayat.

In its petition, ISPAI has challenged the order passed by the CCI and requested the tribunal to direct Director General for Investigation (DGI) to probe its allegation.

Refusing to hand over the matter to its probe unit DGI, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) in its order dated June 29 had held that 'prima facie' no case existed on allegations of ISPAI.

ISPAI has submitted that the closure of the case by CCI was wrong and it was based on the wrong representation made by the DoT before the fair trade regulator.

The association said that the sectoral regulator TRAI had in 2009 recommended that the Department of Telecom (DoT) allow ISPs to use telephone lines to make internet telephony calls.

However, DoT did not take any decision and did not allow opening of the Internet telephony to favour mobile operators and is preventing fair competition as it would result in cheaper calls.

CCI had closed the matter after the DoT submitted before it that the matter was still in active consideration before it.

CCI in its order passed by its five members had said,"DoT clearly states that they have received the recommendations of TRAI and it is under active consideration. Since the matter is under the consideration of the government, no further action is required at this stage".

However, the CCI in its five-page order had also asked DoT "to take early decision in this matter".

Requesting an investigation by DGI in this matter, ISPAI submitted that DoT had given an impression before the CCI that it would take a decision very soon, which did not happen.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Nepal Floods: India keeps close watch on the situation

India`s central government has been keeping a close watch on the situation arising out of the flash flood in Nepal on Wednesday. Union home minister Amit Shah spoke with the chief ministers of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, the two states that share the border with Nepal, regarding the disaster

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter