Broadcasters issue self-regulatory guidelines for non-news channels

The move is intended to redress bona fide complaints of viewers

GN Bureau | May 2, 2011



The Indian Broadcasting Foundation (IBF) has approved a self regulatory guidelines and complaints redressal mechanism” for all non news channels, including general entertainment, children, special interest channels.

In a release after its board of directors meeting on Monday, IBF said, “The Guidelines will usher in an efficient, transparent and independent self regulatory mechanism that will provide the channels with certain guiding principles for content programming.” It pitched for a redressal mechanism for bona fide complaints from viewers as also underlining that at the same time programming creativity should not be hampered. The move is intended to prevent ad hoc intervention from various statutory authorities, and pressure groups”

This will be a two tier mechanism where the viewer will first complain to the broadcaster or the channel and in case of no or dissatisfactory response, follow up with the Broadcasting Content Complaints Council (BCCC) at the industry level. BCCC will have thirteen members headed by former chief justice of Delhi high court, A P Shah. The other members will include, four each non-broadcasters and broadcasters and as many from national statutory commissions.

The draft of the guidelines has adopted suitable modifications to the ministry of information and broadcasting self regulation guidelines for broadcasting sector draft version of 2008 after a comprehensive consultative process by stakeholders across the government, civil society, NGO’s and industry.

“These self regulation guidelines , content code and certification rules sets out principles, guidelines and ethical practices which shall guide the Broadcasting Service Provider (BSP) in offering their programming services in India so as to conform to the Programme Code prescribed under the Cable Television Networks (regulations) Act 1995, irrespective of the medium/platform used for broadcasting of the programme.”, says the release.

The IBF’s Board took the decision to implement the self regulatory guidelines in view of the pendency of disposal of the public interest litigation in the Supreme Court and the Delhi high court and the ad hoc arbitrary notices being issued to channels under the programming code.

An IBF delegation will shortly meet the I & B minister to inform her about the implementation of the Self Regulatory Guidelines and Complaints Redressal Mechanism.

“In view of the sensitivities involved in the non-news content segment and after due consideration of the observations made by various judicial forums as well as to bring non-IBF members within the ambit of self regulation, IBF recommends that the Self-regulatory content guidelines be notified immediately for all non-news channels under the Cable Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 replacing the present programme code. The notification of self-regulatory content code should be delinked from the broadcast bill in the interest of all the stakeholders of the broadcasting sector especially the viewer.”

IBF has expressed hope that the move will ensure compliance by majority of channels. However, the IBF has also cautioned that the proliferation of unregulated content provided by local cable operators masquerading as channels showing movies and other programmes will not be regulated by these guidelines. “In most cases, the movies shown are pirated and uncensored. These operators also put their scrolls on their channel and run their own advertisements. Since the content of such channels cannot be monitored by the IBF, the government must immediately institute a licensing system for continued operation of these channels to avoid any viewer complaints to the IBF in this regard.”

 
 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter