NHRC takes exception to Guj govt's reluctance in paying comp

Families of 238 tribals died in quartz crushing factories

PTI | July 5, 2011



The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on Tuesday took strong exception to Gujarat government's reluctance in compensating the families of 238 tribals, who died due to silicosis while working in quartz crushing factories, and warned it would have to approach the supreme court if recommendations were not complied with.

Conveying its displeasure over non-compliance of its recommendations, the NHRC asked the Narendra Modi-led government to pay Rs three lakh each as monetary relief to the next of kin of those who died due to silicosis without any further delay.

The commission warned that it will have "no alternative but to approach the supreme court" which is seized of the matter if the government does not file a compliance report along with a proof of payment within six weeks.

The commission noted that the Gujarat government has not taken appropriate measures as per its recommendations for providing monetary relief and other succor to the poor families of the 238 victims of incurable disease silicosis and address their cause.

The victims comprised of tribals from Alirajpur and Jhabua districts in Madhya Pradesh and contracted silicosis while working in quartz crushing factories of Kheda and Panchmahal in Gujarat.

It also asked the legal aid authorities of both Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, from where the tribals belong to, to adopt a "humane approach" to help settle the claims of silicosis victims at the earliest rather than "towing purely a litigational angle" to the issue.

The commission also held the contention of the Gujarat government as "unjustifiable" that the families of such victims can be compensated under the provisions of ESI Act, 1948 and the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter