Should governors stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | July 14, 2010



Karnataka governor H R Bhardwaj created a flutter within the state government and the Bharatiya Janata Party that runs it when he called for removal of corrupt ministers indulging in illegal mining. The governor met the president in Delhi and later told the media that he had already taken up the issue with Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa. "I have told him you have appointed the ministers and you should take action. He says I need time. He doesn't say it is not happening," Mail Today newspaper quoted the governor as having said.

To be sure, the governor is not the first authority to have taken a stand against illegal mining in the state. Karnataka Lokayukta Justice N Santosh Hegde had exposed the extent of illegal mining in a voluminous report and had recently tendered his resignation because the state government had been blocking his efforts to punish the corrupt in this and other cases.

Interestingly, the BJP is not even attempting to defend the indefensible. It is only saying that the governor has no business to speak up on the issue and to demand the removal of Bellary's Reddy brothers who hold cabinet posts. In other words, it is saying that the highest constitutional authority should not intervene even in cases of blatant violation of public trust placed in members of the government that functions in his name. Not for the first time, the BJP's stand echoes the line taken by the Left Front government in West Bengal which had come under public criticism by then then governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi for its mishandling of the Singur crisis.

The question, therefore, arises, whether governors should stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance.

 

Comments

 

Other News

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Doctors, experts call for ban on junk food ads, mandate warning labels

More than 30 doctors, medical scientists and public health professionals have urged the government to take decisive action against the aggressive advertising and marketing of junk food, calling for a watershed ban on advertisements for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPF

Asiatic Lion population rises from 523 in 2015 to 891 in 2025

On World Lion Day 2026, environment, forest and climate change Minister  Bhupender Yadav celebrated India’s remarkable journey in lion conservation and reaffirmed the country’s unwavering commitment to protecting wildlife and biodiversity.   In a post on soc

Railways imposed ₹5.13 crore fine for food quality and hygiene violations

Indian Railways serve about 58 crore meals every year on an average. About only 0.0008% food quality related complaints are received on average. Based on complaints during the last three years, appropriate penal actions have been taken by IRCTC. Such actions include imposition of fines amounting to ₹5.13

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter