Should governors stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | July 14, 2010



Karnataka governor H R Bhardwaj created a flutter within the state government and the Bharatiya Janata Party that runs it when he called for removal of corrupt ministers indulging in illegal mining. The governor met the president in Delhi and later told the media that he had already taken up the issue with Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa. "I have told him you have appointed the ministers and you should take action. He says I need time. He doesn't say it is not happening," Mail Today newspaper quoted the governor as having said.

To be sure, the governor is not the first authority to have taken a stand against illegal mining in the state. Karnataka Lokayukta Justice N Santosh Hegde had exposed the extent of illegal mining in a voluminous report and had recently tendered his resignation because the state government had been blocking his efforts to punish the corrupt in this and other cases.

Interestingly, the BJP is not even attempting to defend the indefensible. It is only saying that the governor has no business to speak up on the issue and to demand the removal of Bellary's Reddy brothers who hold cabinet posts. In other words, it is saying that the highest constitutional authority should not intervene even in cases of blatant violation of public trust placed in members of the government that functions in his name. Not for the first time, the BJP's stand echoes the line taken by the Left Front government in West Bengal which had come under public criticism by then then governor Gopalkrishna Gandhi for its mishandling of the Singur crisis.

The question, therefore, arises, whether governors should stay mum even in cases of gross misgovernance.

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter