Shouldn't Congress party do away with the charade of party president polls?
Author Profile
Few images can possibly be as surreal as that of Sonia Gandhi filing a nomination paper for her re-election as Congress party president. "Why four times, she could be the party president 40 times if the party wants," Janardan Dwivedi, a general secretary of the party said in response to the Bharatiya Janata Party's suggestion that she should offer the position to someone from outside the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. A fitting response to a mischievous suggestion. After all, doesn't she remember the days when Narasimha Rao and Sitaram Kesri were at the helm? Isn't she acutely aware that there is a world of difference between power without accountability and recognition without power?
Doesn't it make sense for the Congress, then, to do away with the farce of elections for the post of party president? In any case, it doesn't make the party any more democratic if it goes through the charade of periodically re-electing someone who calls the shots anyway. In fact, it wouldn't make the party any less democratic either if the party chief is formally called the queen, with a prince as heir apparent, instead of president.



THISCHARADEof elections is a farce in a dynastic party.sonia G SHOLDBE ELECTED for lifetime andfolowedbyrahul/priyaka and their progeny thereafter.afterall congressparrty has got the divine right to rule bharatvarsha.and people of bharat r their vassals.
I can't understand why the BJP is so afraid of the Gandhis.Varun gandhi did a lot of damage to its reputation during the last elections but BJP did not take him to task. Everybody knows what sort of democracy is prevailing in BJP and other parties for selecting the party president every body knows.
Post new comment