Shouldn't the demand for Anderson's extradition have come from India?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | June 9, 2010



“A sentence of merely two years for those responsible for the world's worst chemical disaster is outrageous. All those responsible for this disaster, including Warren Anderson, former chairman of Union Carbide, should stand trial in India and receive punishment that reflects the devastation and pain they have caused for thousands of people.... Warren Anderson absolutely deserves to be extradited from the US and punished for the full extent of his crimes.

Despite all the sound and fury over the tragic verdict that came more than 25 years after the Bhopal gas leak, the demand for Anderson's extradition quoted above did not emanate from the Indian government. Neither it did from the principal Opposition. Yes, Indian politicians did sense the public mood well enough to join the chorus and slam the verdict in television studios.

But it took a US Congressman, Frank Pallone, Jr to demand Anderson's extradition and best articulate the pain and outrage at the sentence that only added insult to the injury inflicted by the compensation handed out earlier.

The question therefore arises whether the Indian government, failing which, the Opposition, shouldn't have demanded Anderson's extradition. Why did both the Congress party and the Bharatiya Janata Party stop well short of making this specific demand? Again, would the Left parties have bothered to do so if Anderson had not been an American and had been a Chinese national, for example?       

Comments

 

Other News

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Doctors, experts call for ban on junk food ads, mandate warning labels

More than 30 doctors, medical scientists and public health professionals have urged the government to take decisive action against the aggressive advertising and marketing of junk food, calling for a watershed ban on advertisements for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPF

Asiatic Lion population rises from 523 in 2015 to 891 in 2025

On World Lion Day 2026, environment, forest and climate change Minister  Bhupender Yadav celebrated India’s remarkable journey in lion conservation and reaffirmed the country’s unwavering commitment to protecting wildlife and biodiversity.   In a post on soc

Railways imposed ₹5.13 crore fine for food quality and hygiene violations

Indian Railways serve about 58 crore meals every year on an average. About only 0.0008% food quality related complaints are received on average. Based on complaints during the last three years, appropriate penal actions have been taken by IRCTC. Such actions include imposition of fines amounting to ₹5.13

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter