Shouldn't the demand for Anderson's extradition have come from India?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | June 9, 2010



“A sentence of merely two years for those responsible for the world's worst chemical disaster is outrageous. All those responsible for this disaster, including Warren Anderson, former chairman of Union Carbide, should stand trial in India and receive punishment that reflects the devastation and pain they have caused for thousands of people.... Warren Anderson absolutely deserves to be extradited from the US and punished for the full extent of his crimes.

Despite all the sound and fury over the tragic verdict that came more than 25 years after the Bhopal gas leak, the demand for Anderson's extradition quoted above did not emanate from the Indian government. Neither it did from the principal Opposition. Yes, Indian politicians did sense the public mood well enough to join the chorus and slam the verdict in television studios.

But it took a US Congressman, Frank Pallone, Jr to demand Anderson's extradition and best articulate the pain and outrage at the sentence that only added insult to the injury inflicted by the compensation handed out earlier.

The question therefore arises whether the Indian government, failing which, the Opposition, shouldn't have demanded Anderson's extradition. Why did both the Congress party and the Bharatiya Janata Party stop well short of making this specific demand? Again, would the Left parties have bothered to do so if Anderson had not been an American and had been a Chinese national, for example?       

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter