No proposal for dedicated cyber surveillance : Govt

Says IT Act, 2000 has adequate provisions to deal with such situations

PTI | December 6, 2012



The government on Wednesday said there is no proposal to set up a dedicated cyber surveillance agency for monitoring "malicious content" on the web and social media networks.

"There is no proposal with the Government...The Information Technology (IT) Act, 2000 has adequate provisions to deal with such situations," Minister of State for Communications and IT Milind Deora in a written reply to Lok Sabha.

He was responding to a specific query on whether the government is proposing to monitor web and social media content which have implications of law and order etc. in the country.

The government has held several rounds of discussions with stakeholders, including the social media to address the issue of proper implementation of the provisions of the Act, he added.

Deora said all stakeholders would work together to "minimise the unintended consequences and evolve the processes through clarification and guidelines as necessary".

Further, he informed that there have been no requests from the Ministry of Home Affairs to authorise Intelligence Bureau to monitor the web and social media services for malicious content.

Responding to another query, Deora said there has been an increase in incidents involving revealing of personal information such as passwords and credit card details through phishing attacks.

"According to Reserve Bank of India and CERT-In, a total number of 1,618, 2,124 and 2,853 phishing incidents were reported to them in the year 2010,2011 and 2012 (till October), respectively," he said.

Deora added that CERT-In is working very closely with RBI and other banks in the country towards taking immediate steps to curb phishing attacks, adopting multi-factor authentication and technological solutions for early detection and take down of phishing attempts.

"Section 43A of the IT Act, 2000 and rules notified thereunder establishes a legal framework for data privacy protection in India. It mandates body corporates to implement reasonable security practices, framework for mode of collection, transfer and disclosure of sensitive personal data or information," he said.

Further, Section 66 C and 72 A of the IT Act, 2000 provides for punishment and penalty for identity theft and breach of confidentiality and privacy, respectively.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter