Time to look at e-waste seriously

E-waste remains the dark side of technology with not much awareness about its disposal and recycling

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | October 1, 2013



As technology increasingly becomes a part of everyday lives, waste management of tech equipments such as computers, printers, laptops in large quantities becomes imperative. The e-waste management act was passed in 2011 which laid down several policies for the management and disposal of e-waste in India. This act also included the extended producer responsibility (EPR) policy which puts the responsibility of disposal of e-waste on the producer no matter how many times the product changes hands.

However, people know little about the act, let alone that the responsibility of e-waste disposal lies on the original producer. As a first in a series of awareness workshops, Manufacturers Association for Information Technology (MAIT), Government of India and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) organised a conference for awareness on e-waste rules for bulk consumers, including government organisations.

Sushil Kumar, additional secretary, ministry of environment and forests said that making laws and acts is merely an aspirational act. “We need to spread awareness about the act. What we are doing now should have been done in the beginning of 2012. MAIT, FICCI and ASSOCHAM should organise a CEO summit to discuss this issue,” he said.

Kumar said that responsible disposal of e-waste is one of the most important corporate social responsibilities of the companies. “It is not just an important CSR activity, it is also a compliance issue,” he said.

Kumar also urged that the producers need to come on board in a big way, because according to EPR policies, the ultimate responsibility lay with them. In the absence of producers, 'kabadiwallahs' or local scrap collectors fill the void to collect e-waste from various locations. These kabadiwallahs however, are not accountable for its proper disposal. “We need to make sure that nothing from bulk consumers goes to the kabadiwallahs but to right retailers,” said Kumar.

Amit Sardana, Managing Director, Dataserve APAC agreed with Kumar on both issues and said that e-waste disposal is indeed a compliance issue more than anything else. About kabadiwallahs and the resultant problems due to unsafe e-waste disposal, Sardana said, “Let the e-waste not go to organised and formal kabadiwallahs as it can cause massive damage and problems in the next three to five years. E-waste dumping has already killed many cities.”

Kumar stressed on the need to make the CEOs, company heads and government employees aware of the e-waste rules. “A civilisation needs to take care of its waste to survive,” he said.

A number of companies try to extract revenues from e-waste disposal by quoting high prices from the recyclers. These prices are sometimes more than the 'reserve price' or the minimum price for bidding for a specific kind of e-waste. In such a situation, recyclers face a tough time buying products for recycling which hampers the disposal of e-waste. Expressing his concern on this practice, Kumar said that e-waste is not a revenue extraction exercise, especially for high earning companies. “Committees need to fix the reserve price; CAG does not reserve prices, committees do,” he said.

Sardana informed that the companies disposing e-waste should also take into account the cost of disposing hazardous materials while calculating the selling price. “The reserve price does not include this cost therefore most recyclers do not care about disposing hazardous waste safely,” said Sardana.

Another basic issue of the e-waste management cycle is the determination of the 'end-of-life' (EOL) of an electronic product. Kumar suggested that members of CPCB and MAIT can form guidelines for identifying the EOL of a product. “The committee can also form guidelines for calculation of reserve price and for value of the disposed product,” said Kumar.

Sardana said that the value of the product at EOL can be calculated by calculating the cost of its salvageable materials. He also urged for better collection mechanisms including online bidding methods for better collection and disposal of e-waste. “The most important aspects of e-waste disposal is data security, compliance and ethical recycling,”said Sardana.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter