Manipur info commissioner orders Rs 1 lakh fine

Education department didn't provide information on teachers' recruitment

prasanna

Prasanna Mohanty | February 13, 2010



The Manipur state information commission has directed the education department (schools), in the state to provide a compensation of Rs 1 lakh to an applicant for its failure to provide information sought under the RTI Act.

Imphal East resident Bidyapati Laishram filed an application in the directorate of education (schools) on May 9, 2007.

Bidyapati had sought information regarding written test and viva-voce of the science graduate teacher recruitment examination held in the year 2006.

On not getting any response from the Public Information Officer (PIO) and appellate authority, she approached the state information commission.

On September 10, 2007, the commission had asked the PIO to furnish information to Bidyapati in a week’s time. However, the department did not comply with the order.

The response, according to the information commission, was “unusual” and “ridiculous.”

“Withholding of the information had led the applicant suffer both mentally and physically in attending the office of the commission on each hearing day during such a long period for which she deserves compensation,” said the order.

During the hearing, the PIO argued that he did not receive the asked documents from the concerned officers and hence, could not provide the same to the applicant.

The commission rejected the arguments and said: “Commission is of the view that it is the responsibility of the department to trace the documents, fix responsibility for keeping the documents and file criminal case against such officers who are intentionally hiding the documents.”

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter