Did you quit for the Jan Lokpal, really?

We need to open our eyes before face-saving exercises go down in history as acts of martyrdom

shivangi-narayan

Shivangi Narayan | February 15, 2014



So many thoughts come to mind after watching the hilarious, dramatic, erratic, and completely nonsense exit of the Arvind Kejriwal government on Friday. Blackmailing. Naiveté of those who want to overhaul everything in a day. Systemic breakdown. Yes, tantrums of kids when they don’t get what they want.

And a tantrum there was. The Kejriwal government wanted to enter the assembly, get the Jan Lokpal bill passed and remove corruption in society, all in one day. Kejriwal knew full well that constitutionally neither the BJP nor the Congress nor the speaker could have helped him until the centre permitted him to table the bill in the assembly. Given Delhi’s semi-statehood, its government has to take the home ministry’s consent before any bill is tabled in the assembly. Stalling came from the centre and no amount of screaming in the Delhi assembly could have or would have changed that.

Another important fact the government could have kept in the back of its mind is that change doesn’t come in a day, or for that matter in 47 days, and anyone who has started to fight for change has known that fully well. It took 200 years to gain independence, hundreds of years to end apartheid and decades to end casteism and achieve women’s rights. Even instant noodles don’t cook in two minutes as advertised.

According to Prashant Bhushan, the Delhi CM resigned because it became clear that BJP and Congress would not let the government work. Was it an insight that came to him only yesterday? The party came to power as a ‘protest’ party, one that was a threat to the mainstream parties from the beginning. It was clear from the start that it was going to be difficult to manoeuvre their way across with constant pressure from those who have been kept from forming the government.

What was then, the answer to such predictable pressure? Resignation? Resignation is the most laughable step that any CM in such a situation would have taken. He could have negotiated with the centre to table the bill. He could have persisted with the bill till the centre would have relented. Till it was ready to be argued in the Delhi assembly. Nothing irks a problem monger (if BJP and Congress were indeed introducing delays in passing of the bill) more than persistence. Resigning in a huff is war equivalent of letting your opponent win because you refused to put up a brave fight.

Come on, Kejriwal. You knew you wouldn’t be able to table the Jan Lokpal bill. You knew there would be opposition to it constitutionally. You were all ready to resign because your party has now developed a life of its own and has become unmanageable. It was a clear-cut face-saving exercise.

Just that it doesn’t save your face but exposes it more so. Please do not campaign for the Lok Sabha after this debacle. You have no right to take on more promises when you couldn’t deliver the few you undertook in December 2013. 

 

Comments

 

Other News

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times  Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695  

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter