Article 35A explained -Governance Now

Article 35A explained

Article 35A has a close relationship with Article 370

GN Bureau | August 8, 2017

#Article 35 A #Jammu and Kashmir

(Photo: Arun Kumar)

Article 35 A gives the Jammu and Kashmir legislature special power to frame laws to give privileges and rights to the residents of the state.

Former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Farooq Abdullah is upset with what he sees as an attempt change the demographic composition of the Kashmir Valley in the wake of a PIL challenging Article 35A in the supreme court, reported India Today.

Article 35A is closely linked to Article 370 which grants special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

The contentious article 35A entitles the Jammu and Kashmir assembly to define permanent residents of Jammu and Kashmir.

Article 35A http://jklaw.nic.in/constitution_jk.pdf says: “Saving of laws with respect to permanent residents and their rights.- Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution, no existing law in force in the State of Jammu and Kashmir, and no law hereafter enacted by the Legislature of the State,-

defining the classes of persons who are, or shall be permanent residents of the State of Jammu and Kashmir; or
conferring on such permanent residents any special rights and privileges or imposing upon other persons any restrictions as respects-

employment under the State Government;
acquisition of immovable property in the State;
settlement in the State; or
right to scholarships and such other forms of aid as the State Government may provide, shall be void on the ground that it is inconsistent with or takes away or abridges any rights conferred on the other citizens of India by any provision of this part."

It means permanent resident is a person who was a state subject on May 14, 1954 and has “lawfully acquired immovable property in the state”.

An outsider can neither buy property in the state nor get a job in the Jammu and Kashmir government.

Times of India said that Article 35A was interpreted as discriminatory against J&K women. It disqualified them from their state subject rights if they married non-permanent residents. But, in a landmark judgment in October 2002, J&K high court held that women married to non-permanent residents will not lose their rights. The children of such women don't have succession rights.

Mehbooba Mufti has already warned against making changes to Article 35A.

“Any tinkering with the article will not be acceptable. I will not hesitate in saying that nobody will even carry the corpse of the national flag in Kashmir [if the article is scrapped]. Let me make this very clear,” she was quoted as saying.

Comments

Other News

Bullet Train Project: Third mountain tunnel breakthrough achieved

A major engineering milestone has been achieved in the Mumbai–Ahmedabad Bullet Train Project with the successful breakthrough of the third mountain tunnel (MT-07) at Ambesari village in Dahanu Taluka of Palghar district, Maharashtra. With this achievement, three mountain

Supreme Court gets five new judges

Five new judges were appointed to the Supreme Court of India on Monday. "Vide Notifications of even number dated 01.06.2026, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (2) of Article 124 of the Constitution of India, the Hon’ble President of India is pleased to appoint (i) Shri

Astonishing breadth and depth of ancient Indian knowledge systems

The Greatest Books of Ancient India: Incredible Ideas about Science, Music, Maths, Art and More By Dr. Pradeep Chakravarthy and Dr. R. Thiagarajan Hachette India, 208 pages, Rs 399

Strong El Nino threat over India`s monsoon, food & water security

India is heading into the southwest monsoon season this year under the shadow of a rapidly strengthening El Nino, with meteorologists warning that the climate phenomenon could significantly disrupt rainfall patterns, intensify heat stress and place additional pressure on the country’s agriculture-d

How corporates can nudge real change

The Business Of Business Is (Not) Just Business: How Behavioural Tools Can Drive Real Change Edited by Sutapa Banerjee, with Foreword by Nadir Godrej HarperCollins, 336 pages, Rs 699

India stopped jailing people for paperwork. Now comes the hard part

A small pharmacist in Rajkot neglects to change a notice in his store under a little-known clause of a public health law. This was not only a non-compliance matter, but also a criminal offence, and a jail sentence was the punishment under the old system. Not a fine. Not a warning. Jail. Now scale