Bangalore blast sets off netas against each other

In a series of low-intensity blasts of brain-mouth conflict in the aftermath of the bomb blasts that left over 15 people injured, politicians spew inanity at each other

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | April 17, 2013




The genesis of the problem with Indian politicians, as these columns and many others have said before, lies within a few inches of each other: their brain, and their mouth. Like good hand-eye coordination required of a batsman, it’s the brain-mouth coordination that is of key importance for a neta.

The problem begins when there’s a malfunction and the latter (mouth) shoots off before the former (brain) has had sufficient time to collate and crunch all information.

Like in the case of the blast outside the BJP office in Bangalore on Wednesday morning. Minutes after a blast in Malleshwaram locality of the city around 10.30 am left many injured (reports late in the afternoon put the number of injured at 16, including at least eight policemen), Shakeel Ahmed, senior Congress leader and former minister of state for home, let his Twitter handle take over from his brain. “If the blast near BJP's office in Bangalore is a terror attack, it will certainly help the BJP politically on the eve of election,” Ahmed tweeted at 11.52 am.

That, mind you, was after the national investigation agency (NIA) was called out to check the spot and before its officers reached the scene. And also before the state DGP and the union or state home minister had had their say.

Within minutes, as a live update account on firstpost.com reported, a Twitter account for the BJP in Karnataka retaliated, “Congress Spokesperson Shakeel Ahmad’s tweet on blasts in Bangalore is insensitive and inhumane.”

Insensitive? Surely. Inhumane? Yup. Callous? Of course. But more than anything else, it’s stupid and completely unwarranted. And the last is an adjective suitable for the gentleman/lady who sent out that tweet from the BJP account: unwarranted, more or less if not totally. In a state that goes to assembly polls on May 5, and for which Wednesday was the last day for filing of nominations, the ruling party is required to do more after a blast in the state capital than replying to inane tweets from the leader of another party. That rebuttal, mind you, is also dabbling in politics — and that, too, runs the risk, though relatively less, of being seen as insensitive within minutes of a tragedy.

Within minutes of all this, Karnataka home minister R Ashok, who reached the blast site around 1 pm, faced his own moment of brain-mouth dissonance.
After appealing people to remain calm (correctly), he said the culprits will be caught and punished (very good) and that the target was the BJP (well, the probe has barely started). As icing on the hit-the-buzzer-before-others cake, Ashok also pronounced it a “clear case of terror act”, one "targeted at the BJP, our senior leaders and workers". And if there was room for any doubt, he even reiterated: "Hundred percent... it is targeted at BJP workers.”

Have we all become Mamata Banerjee clones? Do we believe in assertion first, and investigation only afterward?

Lest anyone dared forget the Shakeel Ahmed tweet, Ashok’s fellow BJP leader Shahnawaz Hussain took the attack to the Congress again late afternoon. He called a media conference and said a lot, the gist of which went like: “Has the Congress stooped so low that it has now started searching for politics even in a blast?... His (Shakeel Ahmed’s) comment will act as salt on the wounds of victims.”

Brave and all but, well, still unwarranted.

In Kolkata to take part in the eastern zonal council meeting, home minister Sushilkumar Shinde, an old victim of that temporary brain-mouth disorder as also diagnosed with foot-in-mouth disorder, salvaged the situation somewhat, saying, “I came to know of the Bangalore blast and will start an inquiry into the incident. I will also have interaction with the Karnataka government and the police department.”

Asked whether it was an act of terror, Shinde replied that this would be made known only after the probe was over, PTI reports.

Well, at least some semblance of order there!

Comments

 

Other News

Caring for cancer patients: the expanded network of facilities

Health is a State subject, and the primary responsibility for providing healthcare services, including cancer care, rests with the respective state governments. However, the Department of Health and Family Welfare provides technical and financial support to States and Union Territories across the country

Capabilities, aspirations of India’s youth limitless: Modi

The capabilities and aspirations of India’s youth are limitless, prime minister Narendra Modi said in his remarks to the media at the start of monsoon session of the parliament on Monday.  "In the past month, the country has achieved many milestones, filling citiz

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter