Break silence on 'clean chit to Modi' reports: Ex-CM to SIT

Mehta says SIT's silence will break people's trust

PTI | January 6, 2012



Any clean chit to Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi in 2002 riot cases would be a "big worry" for democracy and criminal justice system of the country, former CM Suresh Mehta said on Thursday.

In a letter to R K Raghavan, chairman of the supreme court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing some of the post-Godhra riot cases, he said a clean chit to the BJP stalwart will also be a critical reflection on the agency.

Mehta appealed to SIT to break its silence on recent media reports that Modi had been absolved with regards to the large-scale communal violence, triggered by Godhra train carnage in February 2002.

"If the media reports are true, then it would be a big worry for democracy and criminal justice system of the country," the former chief minister maintained.

"SIT's silence on the issue is likely to shake the trust people have in an investigating agency like them," Mehta said and described the media reports as selective leaks.

He said SIT was not a judicial court and it was improper for the agency to make any judgemental statements, especially when investigations are yet to complete.

In the letter, the former BJP leader provided a list of points on which SIT needs to investigate and "apply mind".

He said if SIT completely ignores riot victim Zakia Jaffery's complaint implicating Modi and 63 others in riots, it would be a shameful event in the history of Gujarat.

"My letter to you becomes relevant as it has been nearly two months since the media reports appeared and over three months have passed since the supreme court ruling on Zakia's complaint (which has been referred to the lower court in Ahmedabad)."

"This raises serious concern as the SIT has still not filed any progress report," said Mehta, who quit the BJP ahead of the 2007 Assembly polls.

The former chief minister stated that SIT had "ignored" important points about the riot cases despite letters and statements from several people.

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter