Brinda Karat, Prashant Bhushan slam MCI action; seek Harsh Vardhan's intervention

CPM, AAP leaders shoot off letters to health minister, seeking action against endorsement of commercial products by doctors

pankaj

Pankaj Kumar | July 1, 2014 | New Delhi



Noted lawyer and Aam Admi Party (AAP) leader Prashant Bhushan and Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM) leader Brinda Karat wrote a letter to the health minister Dr Harsh Vardhan to protect whistle blower Dr K V Babu from Kerala, who had brought to the notice of the Medical Council of India (MCI), the endorsment of commercial products by four doctors, which was illegal and against the MCI code of ethics. 

A memorandum of understanding (MoU) was signed between the group of doctors in the name of Indian Medical Association (IMA) and PepsiCo for endorsement of their products — Quaker Oats and Tropicana on the payment of Rs 1.56 crore.

Bhushan’s letter states: “In 2010 November, the MCI declared that the PepsiCo food Products endorsement by IMA as unethical. The decision was declared in the Lok Sabha by Ghulam Nabi Azad, the then union health minister.”

The letters also say, Babu was later victimized by IMA that also decided to expel him. When he complained against this injustice, his complaint was heard by the MCI ethics committee, which found out that the four doctors were guilty of professional misconduct and recommended removal of their names from the Indian medical register for a year. This decision was taken in June 2013.

However, the newly-elected board of the MCI overturned the decision of the ethics committee. The MCI said it had no right to punish the IMA as it did not come under its purview. 

Both Bhushan and Karat have written letters to the health minister, seeking action against the endorsement of commercial products and to protect Babu.

Karat wrote: “If the ill-conceived argument by the MCI is accepted, a situation will arise, where the law breakers and harassers acting in concert in the name of an association are exonerated and the whistleblower doctor will be punished.”

“It is clear that, the MCI is not complying with the provisions of the IMC Act 1956 and hence I request you to look into the matter and intervene in the interests of ensuring that the MCI does not violate its mandate to maintain high ethical standards,” she added. 

(Read Brinda Karat's full letter here)
(Also read Prashant Bhushan's full letter here)
 

Comments

 

Other News

India lost Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud in five years: DoT

India has lost more than Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud over the last five years, officials have revealed. Out of approximately 60 lakh cyber fraud complaints received, more  than 3,000 cases have been resolved and six cyber fraud setups have been busted.   On the occ

India must not wait for its own Ella

In many Indian cities, children learn to wear masks before they are old enough to understand why. That reality should alarm us far more than it does.   In 2020, nine-year-old Ella Adoo Kissi Debrah became the first person in the world to have air pollution officially recognized a

An ode to the cradle of humankind

The Alphabets of Africa: Poems By Abhay K. Vintage Classics, 280 pages, ₹499.00   Abhay K

Ahmedabad district railway network to be expanded

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday approved the Ahmedabad (Sarkhej) – Dholera Semi High-Speed Double Line project of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 20,667 crore (approx.). It will be Indian Railways 1st semi high-speed project

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter