For Common Man, a Rahman song does not come for a song

Can we afford this extravagance in the name of the Games?

ashishm

Ashish Mehta | April 30, 2010


AR Rahman
AR Rahman

Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit said this week that people living in the capital can afford to pay more taxes or higher electricity rates. Why should a Delhiite, let's call him a Common Man, keep bankrolling the government – especially after paying more for food stuff and paying more for commute? Dikshit would tell him he should be proud to be hosting the Commonwealth Games – it's supposed to be a big event.

How big can be gauged from these numbers, culled from a report in the Mail Today:

The central government budgeted Rs 8,343 crore for various ministries and departments, of which the Delhi government gets Rs 2,800 crore. The Organising Committee (OC), chaired by Suresh Kalmadi, gets Rs 1,620 crore plus Rs 687 crore for “overlays”. For the opening and closing ceremonies, the bill is Rs 200 crore.  These two gala events can't just have the bursting of crackers and schoolchildren presenting song and dance, you also require creative ideas, which don't come cheap. So, there's a creative director who is taking home Rs 25 lakh a month.

And here's the icing on the cake: AR Rahman, popular film music director, will compose a theme song for the opening ceremony. When it's a Rahman song,  it does not come, well, for a song. He reportedly was asking for Rs 15 crore but given the patriotic aspect to it all – Rahman is very patriotic and he has been honoured with Padma Vibhushan for this, he has agreed to give the Common Man a discount. He will charge only Rs 5.5 crore from us.

Now the idea of organising a big sporting event is fine: Indian athletes go abroad for events hosted by others, now it's our turn. India is the second fastest growing economy, even if up to 70 percent
of us might be poor by one of the many estimates doing the rounds. Hosting such events also makes business sense in that they provide an opportunity to showcase the city (minus beggars) before potential
investors who can bring jobs and so on.

But that does not mean throwing a Rs 200 crore party also makes business sense. Whatever Rahman, post his Academy Award, might be charging Bollywood and Hollywood producers, in this instance his logic seems to be that there's nothing wrong or unpatriotic in doing what everybody else is doing. The Common Man cannot afford a Rs 5.5 crore song.

Comments

 

Other News

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici

Wisdom stories that don’t preach but encourage reflection

The Foundation Of A Fulfilling Life: Lessons from Indian Scriptures Deepam Chatterjee Aleph Books, 264 pages, Rs 899  

Citizens of the Bay: Why BIMSTEC matters now

The international order is drifting into a dangerous grey zone as the very powers that built today`s multilateral system begin to chip away at it. The United States has increasingly walked away from global rules and forums when they no longer suit its interests, while China has rushed to fill the vacuum on

PM salutes armed forces on one year of Operation Sindoor

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday saluted the courage, precision and resolve of the armed forces on the completion of one year of Operation Sindoor.   The PM said that the armed forces had given a fitting response to those who dared to attack innocent Indians at Pahalgam.&

Supreme Court judge strength to go up by four to 37

The strength of the Supreme Court is set to go up from 33 judges to 37 judges, paving the way for a more efficient and speedier justice. The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the proposal for introducing The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament to amend The Sup


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter