Delhi councilors defy order on spending disclosure

NGO audits MCD wards, finds most in violation of CIC order on disclosing spending details

brajesh

Brajesh Kumar | March 5, 2012



A year after the central information commission (CIC) passed an order on public disclosure of the spending of the councilors’ fund, an audit by a NGO reveals that most councilors have failed compliance. Satark Nagrik Sanghthan (SNS) made its audit report public here on Monday.

SNS audited 100 wards out of the total of 270 under the municipal corporation of Delhi and found that boards on which the details of spending were to be put up — in a public place — were either missing or the painted details were illegible.

“In our audit we found only 11 wards had boards in good condition with detailed information in Hindi of the expenditure by the councilor. Boards were not put up in 20 wards, in 14 wards the information given was in English. In six wards boards were put up but there was no information on them while 25 wards had information written on a paper and pasted on the board. In the rest of the wards, the details were illegible,” said Anjali Bharadwaj of SNS.
The CIC, on February 10 last year, had ordered the MCD to put up the boards. The order had come after the information watchdog took cognizance of a complaint filed by SNS under section 18 of the RTI Act stating that the details of the funds spent by the councilors should be available suo-motu for the knowledge of the general public.

SNS carried out the audit with the participation of the residents of all the 100 wards. “In my ward, the expenditure details were written by sketch pen, which after the first shower of the monsoon got erased,” said Mridula Devi of ward number 161, Begumpur in Malviya Nagar in south Delhi.
Pushpa Devi, a resident of ward number 191, Lal Gumbad said that the information was put up on a paper and pasted on the board. “The details are written in small letters and it is very difficult to read,” she said.

Shailesh Gandhi, the information commissioner who had passed the order said he will take action against the councilors only after the residents file a written complaint to the commission.

“I am aware of the non-compliance of my order, but the complaints need to come to me in writing following which I will be in a position to take any punitive action,” he said.

Comments

 

Other News

India lost Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud in five years: DoT

India has lost more than Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud over the last five years, officials have revealed. Out of approximately 60 lakh cyber fraud complaints received, more  than 3,000 cases have been resolved and six cyber fraud setups have been busted.   On the occ

India must not wait for its own Ella

In many Indian cities, children learn to wear masks before they are old enough to understand why. That reality should alarm us far more than it does.   In 2020, nine-year-old Ella Adoo Kissi Debrah became the first person in the world to have air pollution officially recognized a

An ode to the cradle of humankind

The Alphabets of Africa: Poems By Abhay K. Vintage Classics, 280 pages, ₹499.00   Abhay K

Ahmedabad district railway network to be expanded

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday approved the Ahmedabad (Sarkhej) – Dholera Semi High-Speed Double Line project of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 20,667 crore (approx.). It will be Indian Railways 1st semi high-speed project

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter