A divorce of little consequences

Trinamool Congress’ withdrawal of support offers more opportunities to an embattled UPA than the odds came of keeping it in


Prasanna Mohanty | September 20, 2012

The Trinamool Congress’ withdrawal of support may reduce the UPA government to a minority but that doesn’t pose any threat to it so long as the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party continue their outside support, thereby keeping the numbers well above the half-way mark of 272. Both these parties have their own reasons to keep the UPA afloat for now and they have said so. Until the political scenario changes drastically, it is business as usual.

Nor does the withdrawal reduce the UPA’s manoeuvreability in terms of legislative or administrative decision making in any way. The Trinamool Congress has been more of an impediment, by stalling whatever measure the union government proposed to take to revive the economy – FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, reforms in land acquisition process, rationalisation of railway fares or fuel price hike etc. In that sense, the severance of ties presents an opportunity by way of dissolution of internal resistance.

That said, what does the Trinamool Congress gain by taking such a step? That is not very clear, nor does it need to be. Mamata Banerjee, the Trinamool Congress chief, has no reputation of being rational or reasonable. She is better known for unpredictability and brink(wo)manship. She loves the thrill of living on the edge, constantly rewriting her relationships. Her independent journey began in 1998 when she broke her two-decade-long association with the Congress to launch the Trinamool Congress. The very next year, she joined the BJP-led coalition and became the railway minister in the NDA regime. A year later, in 2001, she broke away after the Tehelka’s expose on arms deals surfaced; joined hands with the Congress and fought the West Bengal elections with the Congress. In 2004, she broke away again and joined back the NDA.

Just before the 2009 general elections, she went back to the Congress again and became the railway minister in the Congress-led UPA government. She fought the West Bengal elections of 2011 with the Congress. Now, three years down the line, she has broken free. Will it be a surprise if she returns to the UPA fold some months from now? Hardly, at all.

She has withdrawn support to the UPA saying that it isn’t possible for her to support the “anti-people decisions” of the union government –FDI in multi-brand retail, aviation and media; diesel price hike; capping on the number of subsidised LPG cylinders etc. But in the past, every time she was seen stalling FDI in retail and aviation, objecting to the fuel price hike and hike in railway fares or opposing the candidature of Pranab Mukherjee as the presidential candidate, Mamata Banerjee was found negotiating for a financial package with the union government.

She said she needed additional funds because the three-decade-old Left Front rule had left West Bengal bankrupt. But what did she do with whatever fund was available? She launched a drive to paint all public buildings of Kolkata blue. More recently, she was accused of diverting money for education to celebrating Teachers’ Day. On the other hand, she has dubbed anyone questioning or criticising her policies as “Maoist” and put him/her in jail. Rape cases have been dismissed as “conspiracy” against her. These are hardly “pro-people”.

The UPA’ s journey from now onwards becomes very interesting though. Not only the opposition parties like the BJP and Left Front, even allies like the DMK and Samajwadi Party are unhappy with the latest clutch of reform measures the union government has taken. They want these to be rolled back. The DMK would be joining the opposition-sponsored bandh too. Besides, the BJP will be launching a country-wide agitation, taking the mega scams like coal block allocation to the people. The coal scam washed out the monsoon session of parliament, paralysing legislative works. Who knows what will be the fate of the winter session?

In fact, the UPA’s fate would depend more on how these campaigns pan out in the next few months. As of now, it is safe. Nobody wants general elections now. The SP (with 22 members in parliament) says it wants to keep the BJP at bay and hence won’t destabilize the government. The BSP (21) says it lost UP elections six months ago and need more time for the anti-incumbency to set in for its rival, the SP. Their outside support, and also that of RJD (4), JD(S) (3) and others, takes the number on the side of UPA to at least 301 – well past the half-way mark of 272.




Other News

Making sense of facts – and alternative facts

The Art of Conjuring Alternate Realities: How Information Warfare Shapes Your World By Shivam Shankar Singh and Anand Venkatanarayanan HarperCollins / 284 pages / Rs 599 Professor Noam Chomsky, linguist and public intellectual, has often spoken of &ls

The Manali Trance: Economics of Abandoning Caution in the Time of Coronavirus

The brutal second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India has left a significant death toll in its wake. Health experts advise that the imminent third wave can be delayed by following simple measures like wearing a mask and engaging in social distancing. However, near the end of the second wave, we witnesse

Govt considers fixing driving hrs of commercial vehicles

Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways Nitin Gadkari has emphasised deciding driving hours for truck drivers of commercial vehicles, similar to pilots, to reduce fatigue-induced road accidents. In a Na

Telecom department simplifies KYC processes for mobile users

In a step towards Telecom Reforms which aim to provide internet and tele connectivity for the marginalised section, the Department of Telecommunications, Ministry of Communica

Mumbai think tank calls for climate action

Raising concerns over rising seawater levels and climate change, Mumbai First, a 25-year-old public-private partnership policy think tank, has written letters to Maharashtra chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, minister for environment and climate change, tourism and protocol, Aditya Thackeray and Mumbai munic

Creation of ‘good bank’ as important as ‘bad bank’ for NPA management

After the recent announcement of the government guarantee for Security Receipts (SRs) to be issued by a public sector-owned National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL), there is a surge of interest around this desi version of a super bad bank. The entity will acquire around ₹2 trillion bad debts fr

Visionary Talk: Gurcharan Das, Author, Commentator & Public Intellectual on key governance issues


Current Issue


Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter