A divorce of little consequences

Trinamool Congress’ withdrawal of support offers more opportunities to an embattled UPA than the odds came of keeping it in

prasanna

Prasanna Mohanty | September 20, 2012




The Trinamool Congress’ withdrawal of support may reduce the UPA government to a minority but that doesn’t pose any threat to it so long as the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party continue their outside support, thereby keeping the numbers well above the half-way mark of 272. Both these parties have their own reasons to keep the UPA afloat for now and they have said so. Until the political scenario changes drastically, it is business as usual.

Nor does the withdrawal reduce the UPA’s manoeuvreability in terms of legislative or administrative decision making in any way. The Trinamool Congress has been more of an impediment, by stalling whatever measure the union government proposed to take to revive the economy – FDI in multi-brand retail and aviation, reforms in land acquisition process, rationalisation of railway fares or fuel price hike etc. In that sense, the severance of ties presents an opportunity by way of dissolution of internal resistance.

That said, what does the Trinamool Congress gain by taking such a step? That is not very clear, nor does it need to be. Mamata Banerjee, the Trinamool Congress chief, has no reputation of being rational or reasonable. She is better known for unpredictability and brink(wo)manship. She loves the thrill of living on the edge, constantly rewriting her relationships. Her independent journey began in 1998 when she broke her two-decade-long association with the Congress to launch the Trinamool Congress. The very next year, she joined the BJP-led coalition and became the railway minister in the NDA regime. A year later, in 2001, she broke away after the Tehelka’s expose on arms deals surfaced; joined hands with the Congress and fought the West Bengal elections with the Congress. In 2004, she broke away again and joined back the NDA.

Just before the 2009 general elections, she went back to the Congress again and became the railway minister in the Congress-led UPA government. She fought the West Bengal elections of 2011 with the Congress. Now, three years down the line, she has broken free. Will it be a surprise if she returns to the UPA fold some months from now? Hardly, at all.

She has withdrawn support to the UPA saying that it isn’t possible for her to support the “anti-people decisions” of the union government –FDI in multi-brand retail, aviation and media; diesel price hike; capping on the number of subsidised LPG cylinders etc. But in the past, every time she was seen stalling FDI in retail and aviation, objecting to the fuel price hike and hike in railway fares or opposing the candidature of Pranab Mukherjee as the presidential candidate, Mamata Banerjee was found negotiating for a financial package with the union government.

She said she needed additional funds because the three-decade-old Left Front rule had left West Bengal bankrupt. But what did she do with whatever fund was available? She launched a drive to paint all public buildings of Kolkata blue. More recently, she was accused of diverting money for education to celebrating Teachers’ Day. On the other hand, she has dubbed anyone questioning or criticising her policies as “Maoist” and put him/her in jail. Rape cases have been dismissed as “conspiracy” against her. These are hardly “pro-people”.

The UPA’ s journey from now onwards becomes very interesting though. Not only the opposition parties like the BJP and Left Front, even allies like the DMK and Samajwadi Party are unhappy with the latest clutch of reform measures the union government has taken. They want these to be rolled back. The DMK would be joining the opposition-sponsored bandh too. Besides, the BJP will be launching a country-wide agitation, taking the mega scams like coal block allocation to the people. The coal scam washed out the monsoon session of parliament, paralysing legislative works. Who knows what will be the fate of the winter session?

In fact, the UPA’s fate would depend more on how these campaigns pan out in the next few months. As of now, it is safe. Nobody wants general elections now. The SP (with 22 members in parliament) says it wants to keep the BJP at bay and hence won’t destabilize the government. The BSP (21) says it lost UP elections six months ago and need more time for the anti-incumbency to set in for its rival, the SP. Their outside support, and also that of RJD (4), JD(S) (3) and others, takes the number on the side of UPA to at least 301 – well past the half-way mark of 272.

 

Comments

 

Other News

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

From pyramid to platform: BRICS agenda for Global South

In his opening address at the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12, prime minister Narendra Modi did something India`s diplomacy has been building towards for three years: he moved the ‘Voice of the Global South’ from a slogan to a work plan. Addressing the leaders, he argued that t

How to realise the full transformative potential of PM-JAY

The Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), a welfare scheme which covers approximately 45 crore beneficiaries across India, provides cashless health cover of Rs. 5 lakh per family per year. It is the largest health insurance scheme which helped crores of poor families by reducing out-of-pocket expend

The missing men in India`s family planning story

Every pregnancy requires two people. Yet India`s family planning programme continues to ask only one of them to bear almost all of its medical consequences. The newly released National Family Health Survey-6 (2023-24) confirms just how entrenched this asymmetry remains: 36.5% of currently married women a

`Development must be judged beyond GDP, with rights and justice at core`

Delivering the IXth Chief Justice M.C. Chagla Memorial Lecture on ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development Goals’, in Mumbai Friday,  former Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai questioned whether conventional economic indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP), national income,

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter