Media reports wrongly compared Fukushima nuclear disaster with Chernobyl and created panic. It is far less than what happened in Chernobyl
Geetanjali Minhas | April 29, 2011
“Nuclear policy and future preparations should be viewed in a scientific manner. Experts and scientists from all countries should sit and share their experiences and come up with better ideas for safety standards. The decisions cannot be based on emotions.” These views were expressed by Akitaka Saiki, ambassador of Japan to India while addressing a packed audience at the Observer Research Foundation in Mumbai earlier this week.
Allaying fears that there is no meltdown in Japan, the Japanese ambassador said, “Media reports have wrongly compared Fukushima nuclear disaster with Chernobyl and created panic. It is far less than what happened in Chernobyl.”
“As on date, 14,000 people have been reportedly killed and the number is rising as the search continues .13,000 people are missing, 15,000 people have been evacuated and property worth more than 300 billion US Dollars equivalent to 3.3 - 5.2 percent of Japanese GDP has been damaged in unprecedented , unforeseen natural disaster in Japan” he said.
“In the first phase of the supplementary budget, (we) will spend 50 billion US Dollars on recovery of roads, ports, harbors, housing etc. Budget will be spent on removing rubbles which are piling up and providing temporary housing for evacuees and for supporting small and medium enterprises which form more than 90 percent of Japanese companies.”
“Out of 54 nuclear parks operating in Fukushima, six reactors produce ten percent of the total electricity in Japan. Current 29 percent electricity generation from nuclear power will go up to 37 percent by 2014 and further 41 percent by 2019,” he said and added that 29 percent power generation comes from natural gas, 25 percent from coal, 85 percent from hydro power, seven percent from petrol and one percent from geo thermal and other new energy sources.
For constant power supply, a compromise has to be found, he said. “More than 50 percent Japanese population supports nuclear power though safety remains a paramount concern,” the ambassador added.
Fukushima reactors were built in 1970 and since then technology has advanced with constant improvements. “Though Japan has stringent safety standards, like here in India people have sentiments about having reactors in their backyard. Japan cannot afford to import petrol or coal for power generation and solar and thermal energy sources have not been developed to reach consumption levels for the time being” he said.
Speaking on Indo- Japanese economic trade, the Japanese ambassador said, “In 2009 trade between the two countries was merely 12.5 billion US dollars. It is expected to double in next five years.”
On the civil nuclear agreement between India and Japan he said, “We have a common goal in concluding the treaty on both sides.”
Allaying people’s concerns on food production in nuclear disaster areas Saiki, he said that it is neither exported nor under distribution.
Answering a question on lessons learnt from Fukushima diasater, the Japanese ambassador said that Japanese scientists will now have to look into what went wrong and if necessary will have no hesitation to learn from other countries if their quality is better than that of Japan.
Speaking on damage to reactors precipitated by tsunami, Saiki said, “Despite the earthquake, the reactors sustained. The unthinkable happened when during tsunami height of waves was double than that have been projected and the electricity supply to reactors to keep them cool was destroyed. An electricity supply backup system in a remote place would have helped. Perhaps that is one of the lessons that the Japanese scientists will learn now.”
No untoward incidents have been reported from the parts of the capital that witnessed communal riots this week, but the peace Thursday morning was still tentative and a number of those hospitalized for injuries were battling for life. Clashes began Sunday evening and engulfed parts of northe
In the more than 40 hours of stay in India during his two-day visit, US president Donald Trump exhibited his talents as a politician and also a showman with acumen to provide the Indian audience and Americans back home enough opportunity to stay glued to his activities on the Indian soil. Whether it be his
On the second and last day of US president Donald Trump’s India visit, prime minister Narendra Modi said the real foundation of Indo-US friendship is people-to-people relations. Trump, meanwhile, sidestepped the contentious issues of the protests against the new citizenship law, telling a joint press
America loves India, America respects India, said US president Donald Trump as he and first lady Melania Trump began their short visit of India from Ahmedabad on Monday, welcomed by prime minister Narendra Modi. The US president was in Ahmedabad, in Modi`s home state of Gujarat, to attend th
"The year 2020 is going to be a significant year for India and especially for Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSE), "said the Arjun Ram Meghwal, Minister of State for heavy industries and public enterprises on Wednesday at the 7th PSU Awards and Conference organised by Governance Now on 19th
Highlighting the importance of preserving, protecting and promoting Indian languages, the vice president of India, Shri M Venkaiah Naidu spoke in 22 languages at an event to mark International Mother Language Day in New Delhi. He urged all the citizens to take a pledge to promote mother tongue and also lea