Govt's coal mining deliberations undemocratic: civil society

Government misleading public on the “No Go” areas, allege civil society groups

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | March 17, 2011



Civil society groups on Wednesday accused the government of being "undemocratic" in its run-up towards deciding on the environmnetal safe guards, including identification of various no-go areas that are to be considered for coal mining.

The NGOs' statement comes a week before the group of ministers on coal mining policy is expected to deliver a draft on environmental regulations for the sector.

The civil society groups said the government is adopting a fast track approach in approving mining proposals and has absolutely no assessment of the loss of biodiversity and impact on livelihoods due to such operations.

“It is a mockery of democracy that a handful of ministers are deciding the fate of over 600,000 hectares (6,000 sq.km) of India’s forests, behind closed doors and without any public consultation,” said Ashish Fernandes of Greenpeace India in a press conference in New Delhi on Wednesday.

Despite the Forest Conservation Act, the Greenpeace said, since 1980 and 2009 1.2 million hectares of India’s forest land have been diverted for industrial use, and the rate of such diversion has been increasing. “Coal mining has huge environmental and social impacts and any decision on sacrificing forest areas for coal has to address these issues,” said Fernandes.

Greenpeace India also alleged that government is misleading people and Parliament by giving different figures on 'no go' and permitted/permissible areas.

From an initial high of 320,684 ha (out of 652,572 ha) the union environment ministry has now said that only 268,750 ha should be considered “No Go”. After pressure from prime minister office (PMO) and ministry of coal, 77 more blocks were then shifted to ‘go’ zones from ‘no go’, amounting to 35,000 hectares, Greenpeace India alleged.

“In the meeting at the PMO in July 2010, 77 blocks were shifted to the go zones,” Fernandes said.

“Jairam Ramesh, ministry of state for environment and forest (MoEF) gave different figures in parliament,” he added. Different notes obtained by the Greenpeace said how there has been misleading information on “No Go” areas:

•    No Go Areas- 222 Blocks- 3,20,684 Hectares (49% of total land area) - From RTI response in May 2010
•    No Go Areas- 186 Blocks- 2,58,050 Hectares (43% of total land area) – MoEF note in December 2010
•    No Go Areas- 105 Blocks- 1,40,311 Hectares (23.27% of total land area) – according to the revised parameters
•    No Go Areas- 153 Blocks- 2,68,750 Hectares (41.42% of total land area) – Ramesh’s response on 14th March in Parliament.

The civil society groups called for transparency in the matter. There is hardly any representation of other relevant ministries likes the ministry of tribal affairs, ministry of water resources in the GoM.

“There is a web of secrecy surrounding the machinations of the GoM. It’s very mandate is highly suspicious to say the least, and appears to be the first step to weaken India’s environmental safeguards,” said Ritwick Dutta, environmental lawyer from Lawyers initiative for Forests and Environment.

Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee is the head of ministerial panel to sort out environmental issues hurting coal production. The panel was formed in the backdrop of ever widening demand-supply gap in coal which is likely to touch 142 million tonnes next fiscal and classification of 203 coal blocks by environment ministry as “no-go” zones.

“Government claims to care about protecting the rights of forest dwellers and yet has no hesitation in destroying the forest they depend on,” said R. Sreedhar of mines, minerals & people.

Comments

 

Other News

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter