Govt's coal mining deliberations undemocratic: civil society

Government misleading public on the “No Go” areas, allege civil society groups

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | March 17, 2011



Civil society groups on Wednesday accused the government of being "undemocratic" in its run-up towards deciding on the environmnetal safe guards, including identification of various no-go areas that are to be considered for coal mining.

The NGOs' statement comes a week before the group of ministers on coal mining policy is expected to deliver a draft on environmental regulations for the sector.

The civil society groups said the government is adopting a fast track approach in approving mining proposals and has absolutely no assessment of the loss of biodiversity and impact on livelihoods due to such operations.

“It is a mockery of democracy that a handful of ministers are deciding the fate of over 600,000 hectares (6,000 sq.km) of India’s forests, behind closed doors and without any public consultation,” said Ashish Fernandes of Greenpeace India in a press conference in New Delhi on Wednesday.

Despite the Forest Conservation Act, the Greenpeace said, since 1980 and 2009 1.2 million hectares of India’s forest land have been diverted for industrial use, and the rate of such diversion has been increasing. “Coal mining has huge environmental and social impacts and any decision on sacrificing forest areas for coal has to address these issues,” said Fernandes.

Greenpeace India also alleged that government is misleading people and Parliament by giving different figures on 'no go' and permitted/permissible areas.

From an initial high of 320,684 ha (out of 652,572 ha) the union environment ministry has now said that only 268,750 ha should be considered “No Go”. After pressure from prime minister office (PMO) and ministry of coal, 77 more blocks were then shifted to ‘go’ zones from ‘no go’, amounting to 35,000 hectares, Greenpeace India alleged.

“In the meeting at the PMO in July 2010, 77 blocks were shifted to the go zones,” Fernandes said.

“Jairam Ramesh, ministry of state for environment and forest (MoEF) gave different figures in parliament,” he added. Different notes obtained by the Greenpeace said how there has been misleading information on “No Go” areas:

•    No Go Areas- 222 Blocks- 3,20,684 Hectares (49% of total land area) - From RTI response in May 2010
•    No Go Areas- 186 Blocks- 2,58,050 Hectares (43% of total land area) – MoEF note in December 2010
•    No Go Areas- 105 Blocks- 1,40,311 Hectares (23.27% of total land area) – according to the revised parameters
•    No Go Areas- 153 Blocks- 2,68,750 Hectares (41.42% of total land area) – Ramesh’s response on 14th March in Parliament.

The civil society groups called for transparency in the matter. There is hardly any representation of other relevant ministries likes the ministry of tribal affairs, ministry of water resources in the GoM.

“There is a web of secrecy surrounding the machinations of the GoM. It’s very mandate is highly suspicious to say the least, and appears to be the first step to weaken India’s environmental safeguards,” said Ritwick Dutta, environmental lawyer from Lawyers initiative for Forests and Environment.

Finance minister Pranab Mukherjee is the head of ministerial panel to sort out environmental issues hurting coal production. The panel was formed in the backdrop of ever widening demand-supply gap in coal which is likely to touch 142 million tonnes next fiscal and classification of 203 coal blocks by environment ministry as “no-go” zones.

“Government claims to care about protecting the rights of forest dwellers and yet has no hesitation in destroying the forest they depend on,” said R. Sreedhar of mines, minerals & people.

Comments

 

Other News

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Delhi moves to real-time traffic management

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, has approved implementation of the ITMS Project by Delhi Police at an estimated cost of Rs.1,789.52 crore, inclusive of taxes. The project will cover 42 identified traffic corridors and will be implemented in three

MDR on UPI: Can sustainability come without weakening the network?

The extraordinary transaction volumes and value (₹29.82 Lakh crore in August 2026 alone) of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have made it not only an Indian success story, but a global one. In 2024, UPI accounted for nearly 49% of the world’s real-time payment transaction volume, with more th

The Xi-Trump summit: The unending rivalry

Diplomacy is akin to an art, wherein the summitry, conflict resolution and negotiations form apt constituents of the entire context of deal making and “playing for keeps” in the international arena. The Xi-Trump summit in Washington last week, in which the American president broke all conside

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter