If constable wasn’t ‘killed’, did top cop, media jump gun?

Is it regular for Delhi Police chief Neeraj Kumar to give out inexact/imprecise details, according to his own admission, in cases that should be, and subsequently is, under investigation? And why is media already veering off the protests?

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | December 26, 2012


At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.
At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.

Did the police lie about constable Subhash Tomar’s death, nay “murder”, to take life out of the anti-rape protests at India Gate?

Did the government insinuate the same to clear the Rajpath and Vijay Chowk, and by default cleanse its face of eggs that flew thick and fast over the last few days?

And did the media corroborate with both by zooming off completely the protests on Tuesday and not properly reporting in Wednesday’s papers the story of extreme police highhanded, in which a group of teenaged schoolgirls were detained illegally for hours at Parliament Street police station, roughed up in lock-up and warned against taking any further part in the protests?

It is sad that such questions should be asked a day after the Delhi Police constable’s funeral but these are questions that smack of a conspiracy, pardon the Mamata Banerjee-esque parlance.

If Delhi Police commissioner Neeraj Kumar did not know the details of constable Tomar’s death, why did he have to put in the claim in a televised media conference on Christmas day afternoon that “doctors have told us Tomar sustained internal injuries in his chest, neck and stomach that eventually resulted in his death"?

But in the same breath, he also said, "Only the postmortem report, which is awaited, can tell the exact cause of death."

So if what he said not the “exact cause of death”, what was he trying to do, giving out an imprecise cause of death to the whole nation?

According to reports in many sections of the media, including some news channels which on Tuesday stopped beaming the protests live from Jantar Mantar, Tomar might not have been “murdered”, as police’s FIR, changed after the constable’s death, asserts.

An ANI report quoted on firstpost.com says Dr PS Sidhu of Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, where Tomar was admitted after collapsing at India gate on Sunday, has said the constable had “no major external injury marks when he was brought to the hospital” (read the updates/report here).

Dr Sidhu told Hindustan Times that though Tomar had a few broken ribs "that (ribcage fractures) could have happened when we were giving him CPR (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation)”.

A journalism student who claims to be a witness to Tomar’s “collapse” has also said, "He wasn't trampled by the protesters, he wasn't assaulted. He just collapsed while walking.”

Little wonder, then, that Delhi Police has transferred the investigation from its New Derlhi district to the Crime Branch.

So did the police speak with multiple “doctors”, as Neeraj Kumar put it, at RML? Did they get a different version than what Dr Sidhu has told the news agency? And is it a regular ritual for police chief Neeraj Kumar to hold media conferences and give out inexact/imprecise details (according to his own admission) in cases that should logically be under investigation? What was he, and the police, trying to achieve out of all this?

Just as, what were Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit and minister of state for home affairs RPN Singh doing at Tomar’s funeral when no minister visited RML hospital when the constable fought for his life in the ICU for nearly three days, as his son told news channels after his death?

And within hours of his death, what were the police on Parliament Street, with jurisdiction over areas that became suddenly inaccessible for the average citizens for three days, doing by arresting a bunch of teen girls? Are the police retaliating? If we go by their boss’s words (“collateral damage”, which is straight out of Army lexicon), were these girls collateral damage in constable Tomar’s death?

Were the cops out to avenge Tomar’s death? Or were they trying to scare the daylight of young people who even thought of protesting?

Lastly, what prompted this sudden media silence on this episode? This was not just a case of police highhandedness; it was, if events reported by a section of the media (and not the whole) are true, a case of crime. And the criminals were in uniform this time.

Are we all so intent on nipping the protests that we will stop reporting, and reacting, to general crime stories?

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter