If constable wasn’t ‘killed’, did top cop, media jump gun?

Is it regular for Delhi Police chief Neeraj Kumar to give out inexact/imprecise details, according to his own admission, in cases that should be, and subsequently is, under investigation? And why is media already veering off the protests?

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | December 26, 2012


At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.
At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.

Did the police lie about constable Subhash Tomar’s death, nay “murder”, to take life out of the anti-rape protests at India Gate?

Did the government insinuate the same to clear the Rajpath and Vijay Chowk, and by default cleanse its face of eggs that flew thick and fast over the last few days?

And did the media corroborate with both by zooming off completely the protests on Tuesday and not properly reporting in Wednesday’s papers the story of extreme police highhanded, in which a group of teenaged schoolgirls were detained illegally for hours at Parliament Street police station, roughed up in lock-up and warned against taking any further part in the protests?

It is sad that such questions should be asked a day after the Delhi Police constable’s funeral but these are questions that smack of a conspiracy, pardon the Mamata Banerjee-esque parlance.

If Delhi Police commissioner Neeraj Kumar did not know the details of constable Tomar’s death, why did he have to put in the claim in a televised media conference on Christmas day afternoon that “doctors have told us Tomar sustained internal injuries in his chest, neck and stomach that eventually resulted in his death"?

But in the same breath, he also said, "Only the postmortem report, which is awaited, can tell the exact cause of death."

So if what he said not the “exact cause of death”, what was he trying to do, giving out an imprecise cause of death to the whole nation?

According to reports in many sections of the media, including some news channels which on Tuesday stopped beaming the protests live from Jantar Mantar, Tomar might not have been “murdered”, as police’s FIR, changed after the constable’s death, asserts.

An ANI report quoted on firstpost.com says Dr PS Sidhu of Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, where Tomar was admitted after collapsing at India gate on Sunday, has said the constable had “no major external injury marks when he was brought to the hospital” (read the updates/report here).

Dr Sidhu told Hindustan Times that though Tomar had a few broken ribs "that (ribcage fractures) could have happened when we were giving him CPR (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation)”.

A journalism student who claims to be a witness to Tomar’s “collapse” has also said, "He wasn't trampled by the protesters, he wasn't assaulted. He just collapsed while walking.”

Little wonder, then, that Delhi Police has transferred the investigation from its New Derlhi district to the Crime Branch.

So did the police speak with multiple “doctors”, as Neeraj Kumar put it, at RML? Did they get a different version than what Dr Sidhu has told the news agency? And is it a regular ritual for police chief Neeraj Kumar to hold media conferences and give out inexact/imprecise details (according to his own admission) in cases that should logically be under investigation? What was he, and the police, trying to achieve out of all this?

Just as, what were Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit and minister of state for home affairs RPN Singh doing at Tomar’s funeral when no minister visited RML hospital when the constable fought for his life in the ICU for nearly three days, as his son told news channels after his death?

And within hours of his death, what were the police on Parliament Street, with jurisdiction over areas that became suddenly inaccessible for the average citizens for three days, doing by arresting a bunch of teen girls? Are the police retaliating? If we go by their boss’s words (“collateral damage”, which is straight out of Army lexicon), were these girls collateral damage in constable Tomar’s death?

Were the cops out to avenge Tomar’s death? Or were they trying to scare the daylight of young people who even thought of protesting?

Lastly, what prompted this sudden media silence on this episode? This was not just a case of police highhandedness; it was, if events reported by a section of the media (and not the whole) are true, a case of crime. And the criminals were in uniform this time.

Are we all so intent on nipping the protests that we will stop reporting, and reacting, to general crime stories?

Comments

 

Other News

How social media is reshaping elections

Since Brazil’s return to direct presidential elections in 1985, no candidate who finished second in the first round of polling had ever won the presidency. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, now 81, has just done it. What explains the comeback, and what changed in Brazilian politics to make it possi

Cabinet approves Dearness Allowance, Dearness Relief

The union cabinet chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday approved the release of an additional instalment of Dearness Allowance (DA) to central government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners with effect from 01.07.2026 representing an increase of 3% over the existing rates of 6

Cyclone Arnab strikes Andhra as warming oceans amplify storm risks

Cyclone Arnab made landfall along the Andhra Pradesh and Yanam coasts in the early hours of Wednesday as a very severe cyclonic storm, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 125–135 kmph and gusts reaching 150 kmph. Its rapid intensification has raised concerns about how warmer oceans, global warmin

Counting matters but which ones?

The first instinct of public policy is to count. Its harder task is to count what counts. We have become remarkably good at measuring the reach of the welfare state vis-à-vis beneficiaries covered, rupees transferred, houses built, connections installed and services delivered. But some of the most

Inching closer to a trade deal with America

The cooperation between India and the United States goes back quite a time. We need to relegate that era to the backburner when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited US in the times of president Dwight Eisenhower and called the American let-off of 10 million dollars in defence aid to Pakistan as a “gun w

Manch vs Musk: Forty people and a foreign billionaire

About forty people walked the roundabout on Teen Murti Marg to the gate of Chanakyapuri police station, a distance you could cover in under a minute, on Friday to protest against Elon Musk’s Starlink. The walk was called by the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. Nobody joined them on the way, and nobody seeme

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter