Initiate probe against CJI: CJAR

CJAR levels four charges of 'misconduct' against chief justice Dipak Misra

GN Bureau | January 17, 2018


#J Chelameswar   #Prashant Bhushan   #CJAR   #Dipak Misra   #chief justice   #Supreme Court   #R Gogoi   #MB Lokur   #K Joseph  
Illustration: Ashish Asthana
Illustration: Ashish Asthana

The Campaign for judicial accountability and judicial reforms (CJAR) has written to five senior supreme court judges over alleged misconduct by chief justice of India Dipak Misra. 

The CJAR has appealed to the judges -- justices J Chelameswar, R Gogoi, MB Lokur, K  Joseph, AK Sikri -- to conduct an inquiry under the 'in-house procedure for investigating complaints against judges of the high courts and the supreme court’, which is an official procedure laid out for internal enquiries against all judges of the higher judiciary, excluding the CJI.   
   
Senior supreme court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, a member of the CJAR's executive committee, in a press conference, said that there are four major grounds highlighting alleged misconduct by CJI Misra. 
 
He said that first and foremost is the case related to Prasad Education Trust, wherein CBI is probing a graft involving judges in higher judiciary. 
 
“The facts and circumstances relating to the Prasad Education Trust case, show prima facie evidence the chief justice of India, justice Dipak Misra may have been involved in the conspiracy of paying illegal gratification in the case, which at least warrants a thorough investigation,” the CJAR said in its complaint. 
 
Second, the CJI has dealt with the administrative and judicial sides of a writ petition which sought an investigation in a case in which justice Misra himself is likely to be within the scope of investigation as he presided over benches which dealt with this case and passed orders in the care of Prasad Education Trust, and this violated the first principle of code of conduct for judges, the CJAR said.
 
The third charge relates to antedating of an administrative order dated November 6, 2017, which, the CJAR said, amounts to a serious act of forgery / fabrication.
 
The civil society organisation said that “the CJI acquired land while he was an advocate, by giving an affidavit that was found to be false and despite the orders of the ADM cancelling the allotment in 1985, surrendered the said land only in 2012 after he was elevated to the supreme court”.  
 
According to the ‘in house procedure’, complaints against SC judges are sent to the CJI, who then depending in the merit of the case, decide to constitute a committee of three judges of the SC to examine. 
 
“Though this procedure is silent with respect to complaints against CJI himself, it is obvious that complaints against the CJI cannot be examined by the chief justice himself and therefore must be examined by the next judge in seniority or by a collegium of senior judges,” the CJAR said, citing previous judgements of the SC including ‘K Veeraswami v UOI and other (1991 SCC (3) 655)’, ‘Addl District & Session Judge ‘X’ v High Court of MP (2015 4 SCC 91’.
 
The CJAR also made public transcripts of telephonic conversation between retired Odisha high court judge IM Qudussi, middleman Vishwanath Agarwala and BP Yadav of the Prasad Education Trust taped by the CBI. 
 
The complaint copy can be accessed here
 

Comments

 

Other News

India gets the first hydrogen train

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday laid the foundation stone and dedicated to the nation various development projects worth around ₹14,700 crore in Jind, Haryana.   The PM positioned the city as a shining reflection of the good governance model. Emphasizing that the entire Haryana

Climate change is stealing sleep

Climate change has at least doubled the temperature-related sleep loss across 1,338 major cities worldwide over the past five decades, highlighting an emerging but often overlooked public health consequence of rising global temperatures. A new study by Climate Central estimates that between 2020 and

Cabinet approves Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme

The union cabinet chaired by PM Narendra Modi has approved the Mobile Phone Manufacturing Scheme (MPMS) with a budgetary outlay of Rs 62,500 crore. It aims to further scale up the production, deepen domestic value addition, strengthen supply chain resilience, enhance global competitiveness. It

Building infrastructure is only half the job

Recent stories of stolen railway wires, disappearing communication towers and missing public infrastructure are often treated as bizarre law-and-order failures of India. Yet they raise a more fundamental question. Why does the State often discover the disappearance of a public asset only after it has alrea

New Delhi’s Indo-Pacific strategy enters a new phase

India appears to be investing fresh dynamism in its Indo-Pacific strategy. At the time when the US, under president Donald Trump, has adopted a conciliatory approach towards China and has changed the name of America’s Indo-Pacific Command to just Pacific Command, India has quietly moved towards con

CAG flags major fiscal lapses in Maharashtra

Maharashtra`s fiscal management has come under sharp scrutiny after the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India, in its State Finances Audit Report for 2024-25, flagged significant budgetary inefficiencies, accounting irregularities, understatement of key fiscal indicators and widespread governanc

Upcoming Conferences





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter