Initiate probe against CJI: CJAR

CJAR levels four charges of 'misconduct' against chief justice Dipak Misra

GN Bureau | January 17, 2018


#J Chelameswar   #Prashant Bhushan   #CJAR   #Dipak Misra   #chief justice   #Supreme Court   #R Gogoi   #MB Lokur   #K Joseph  
Illustration: Ashish Asthana
Illustration: Ashish Asthana

The Campaign for judicial accountability and judicial reforms (CJAR) has written to five senior supreme court judges over alleged misconduct by chief justice of India Dipak Misra. 

The CJAR has appealed to the judges -- justices J Chelameswar, R Gogoi, MB Lokur, K  Joseph, AK Sikri -- to conduct an inquiry under the 'in-house procedure for investigating complaints against judges of the high courts and the supreme court’, which is an official procedure laid out for internal enquiries against all judges of the higher judiciary, excluding the CJI.   
   
Senior supreme court lawyer Prashant Bhushan, a member of the CJAR's executive committee, in a press conference, said that there are four major grounds highlighting alleged misconduct by CJI Misra. 
 
He said that first and foremost is the case related to Prasad Education Trust, wherein CBI is probing a graft involving judges in higher judiciary. 
 
“The facts and circumstances relating to the Prasad Education Trust case, show prima facie evidence the chief justice of India, justice Dipak Misra may have been involved in the conspiracy of paying illegal gratification in the case, which at least warrants a thorough investigation,” the CJAR said in its complaint. 
 
Second, the CJI has dealt with the administrative and judicial sides of a writ petition which sought an investigation in a case in which justice Misra himself is likely to be within the scope of investigation as he presided over benches which dealt with this case and passed orders in the care of Prasad Education Trust, and this violated the first principle of code of conduct for judges, the CJAR said.
 
The third charge relates to antedating of an administrative order dated November 6, 2017, which, the CJAR said, amounts to a serious act of forgery / fabrication.
 
The civil society organisation said that “the CJI acquired land while he was an advocate, by giving an affidavit that was found to be false and despite the orders of the ADM cancelling the allotment in 1985, surrendered the said land only in 2012 after he was elevated to the supreme court”.  
 
According to the ‘in house procedure’, complaints against SC judges are sent to the CJI, who then depending in the merit of the case, decide to constitute a committee of three judges of the SC to examine. 
 
“Though this procedure is silent with respect to complaints against CJI himself, it is obvious that complaints against the CJI cannot be examined by the chief justice himself and therefore must be examined by the next judge in seniority or by a collegium of senior judges,” the CJAR said, citing previous judgements of the SC including ‘K Veeraswami v UOI and other (1991 SCC (3) 655)’, ‘Addl District & Session Judge ‘X’ v High Court of MP (2015 4 SCC 91’.
 
The CJAR also made public transcripts of telephonic conversation between retired Odisha high court judge IM Qudussi, middleman Vishwanath Agarwala and BP Yadav of the Prasad Education Trust taped by the CBI. 
 
The complaint copy can be accessed here
 

Comments

 

Other News

As nation lighted lamps, power grid delivered

As Indians switched off lights in homes and lighted lamps and candles Sunday night following prime minister Narendra Modi’s appeal as a gesture of solidarity in the fight against COVID-19, the power grid held up well despite the sudden drop in demand. In a short video message on Friday

3 out of 4 Covid-19 patients in 21-60 yrs age group

Contrary to the perception that the elderly are more at risk from Covid-19, in India as many as 41.88% of corona positive cases are between 21 to 40 years of age. Also, 32.82% positive cases are between 41 to 60 years, followed by 16.69% cases above the age of 60 years and 8.61% coronavirus positive cases

Why everyone should wear mask

In view of the increasing number of COVID -19 cases in the country, the ministry of health and family welfare (MoHFW) has now advised that everyone must voluntarily wear a mask and especially those living in densely populated areas.   Not just as a matter of maintaining personal hygiene

Fighting Covid-19, India has realized its collective strength: PM

In the face of the Covid-19 pandemic, people of India have realized their collective strength, prime minister Narendra Modi said in a short video message Friday morning. He also urged people to light lamps Sunday night as a gesture of this collectivity. “Today marks nine days of the na

COVID-19 demobilisation: Lessons for public governance

Demobilization, like its predecessor – demonetization, is another decision gone bad in implementation.  In both instances a careful public administrative action through its governance systems could have saved the magnitude of impact particularly on the most vulnerable sections of the society. Th

Don’t fear Corona, fight it

In a bid to break the “chain of transmission” of the deadly Covid-19, India, a country with more than 1.3 billion population, observed a voluntary ‘Janata Curfew’ on March 22. This has been followed by a 21-day, nationwide lockdown from March 24. Prime minister Narendra Modi also re



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter