Legal eagles condemn Vahanvati, Raval

UPA's shame, blogs Arun Jaitley

pankaj

Pankaj Kumar | May 1, 2013



The political fraternity is caught in a storm over former additional solicitor general Harin Raval's letter to attorney general G E vahanvati, which exposed the UPA government's lies on interference in the CBI's handling of the Coalgate case. Raval had accused vahanvati of interfering in the probe. Eminent lawyers and judges have their own take on the issue but all agree that the two foremost law officers of the country have lied to the supreme court while their duty was to uphold the constitution.

Raval and Vahanvati had both testified before supreme court that the status report of the CBI investigation of irregularities in the allocation of coal blocks were not shown to the government.

However, the director of CBI, Ranjit Sinha, struck down the law officers' version saying that the report had been vetted by the law minister and two joint secretaries of PMO and coal ministry. Sinha had said that the government had inisisted on being given the report before it was submitted on March 8. Now, it is not just the apex court which has condemned the curtailing of the autonomy of the investigating agency. 

Arun Jaitley, leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and a lawyer himself, wrote on his blog, "The UPA Government has denigrated the institution of the law officers. It is this failing institution that has today embarrassed the UPA government".

Senior lawyer and activist Prashant Bhusan, however, believes that the two senior-most law officials of the country have shamed their offices at the behest of their political masters."There is no doubt that he (Vahanvati) is lying and he should be taken apart," Bhushan said.

Justice (retired) R S sodhi, former judge of the delhi high court, minced no words, saying, "These constitutional authorities  are have told a blatant lie. This can't be condoned. Their behavior is unacceptable".

"The attorney general  has helped the accused subvert the investigation of the CBI in most of the politically sensitive cases.He should be the first man to be taken into custody for interrogation. Only then can the truth be out," supreme court lawyer Abani Sahu, amicus curae in the sensitive Jain hawala case, said.

Meenakshi Lekhi, lawyer and BJP spokesperson, said, "It is a case of illegality and impropriety.It is against the principle of natural justice."

 

Comments

 

Other News

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Doctors, experts call for ban on junk food ads, mandate warning labels

More than 30 doctors, medical scientists and public health professionals have urged the government to take decisive action against the aggressive advertising and marketing of junk food, calling for a watershed ban on advertisements for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPF

Asiatic Lion population rises from 523 in 2015 to 891 in 2025

On World Lion Day 2026, environment, forest and climate change Minister  Bhupender Yadav celebrated India’s remarkable journey in lion conservation and reaffirmed the country’s unwavering commitment to protecting wildlife and biodiversity.   In a post on soc

Railways imposed ₹5.13 crore fine for food quality and hygiene violations

Indian Railways serve about 58 crore meals every year on an average. About only 0.0008% food quality related complaints are received on average. Based on complaints during the last three years, appropriate penal actions have been taken by IRCTC. Such actions include imposition of fines amounting to ₹5.13

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter