Legal eagles condemn Vahanvati, Raval

UPA's shame, blogs Arun Jaitley

pankaj

Pankaj Kumar | May 1, 2013



The political fraternity is caught in a storm over former additional solicitor general Harin Raval's letter to attorney general G E vahanvati, which exposed the UPA government's lies on interference in the CBI's handling of the Coalgate case. Raval had accused vahanvati of interfering in the probe. Eminent lawyers and judges have their own take on the issue but all agree that the two foremost law officers of the country have lied to the supreme court while their duty was to uphold the constitution.

Raval and Vahanvati had both testified before supreme court that the status report of the CBI investigation of irregularities in the allocation of coal blocks were not shown to the government.

However, the director of CBI, Ranjit Sinha, struck down the law officers' version saying that the report had been vetted by the law minister and two joint secretaries of PMO and coal ministry. Sinha had said that the government had inisisted on being given the report before it was submitted on March 8. Now, it is not just the apex court which has condemned the curtailing of the autonomy of the investigating agency. 

Arun Jaitley, leader of opposition in Rajya Sabha and a lawyer himself, wrote on his blog, "The UPA Government has denigrated the institution of the law officers. It is this failing institution that has today embarrassed the UPA government".

Senior lawyer and activist Prashant Bhusan, however, believes that the two senior-most law officials of the country have shamed their offices at the behest of their political masters."There is no doubt that he (Vahanvati) is lying and he should be taken apart," Bhushan said.

Justice (retired) R S sodhi, former judge of the delhi high court, minced no words, saying, "These constitutional authorities  are have told a blatant lie. This can't be condoned. Their behavior is unacceptable".

"The attorney general  has helped the accused subvert the investigation of the CBI in most of the politically sensitive cases.He should be the first man to be taken into custody for interrogation. Only then can the truth be out," supreme court lawyer Abani Sahu, amicus curae in the sensitive Jain hawala case, said.

Meenakshi Lekhi, lawyer and BJP spokesperson, said, "It is a case of illegality and impropriety.It is against the principle of natural justice."

 

Comments

 

Other News

India lost Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud in five years: DoT

India has lost more than Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud over the last five years, officials have revealed. Out of approximately 60 lakh cyber fraud complaints received, more  than 3,000 cases have been resolved and six cyber fraud setups have been busted.   On the occ

India must not wait for its own Ella

In many Indian cities, children learn to wear masks before they are old enough to understand why. That reality should alarm us far more than it does.   In 2020, nine-year-old Ella Adoo Kissi Debrah became the first person in the world to have air pollution officially recognized a

An ode to the cradle of humankind

The Alphabets of Africa: Poems By Abhay K. Vintage Classics, 280 pages, ₹499.00   Abhay K

Ahmedabad district railway network to be expanded

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday approved the Ahmedabad (Sarkhej) – Dholera Semi High-Speed Double Line project of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 20,667 crore (approx.). It will be Indian Railways 1st semi high-speed project

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter