Local monitoring missing in rural development projects -Governance Now

Local monitoring missing in rural development projects

State and district-level vigilance and monitoring committees not meeting since formation

Brajesh Kumar | March 24, 2010

State and district vigilance and monitoring committees, formed by the rural development ministry in August last year to keep a watch on the effective implementation of all the flagship schemes of the ministry have not been meeting since their formation.

Members of parliament (MPs), who are the nominated chairmen of these committees, have brought this to the notice of the rural development minister CP Joshi.

“The issues was raised in the performance review committee meeting held by the ministry last week and the rural development minister directed the states to hold these meetings quarterly, failing which funds released to the districts could be withheld ,” said an official in the rural development ministry.

The RD ministry formed these committees with a view to ensure the quality of expenditure, particularly, in the context of large public funds being spent under all the programmes of the Ministry of Rural Development.

While the state vigilance and monitoring committee is headed by the state rural development minister, the district vigilance and monitoring committee is headed by the area MP. The district magistrates are the members of the district vigilance monitoring committee.

These Committees are expected to keep a watch on the implementation of the programmes as per the prescribed procedures and Guidelines.

The objectives include providing a crucial role for the MPs and elected representatives of the people in state legislatures and panchayati raj institutions (PRIs) in the implementation of the Rural Development programmes and to put in place a mechanism to monitor the execution of the schemes in the most effective manner and within the given time frame so that public funds are put to optimal use and programme benefits flow to the rural poor in full measure.

These Committees are also to effectively liaise and coordinate with the ministry of rural development and state governments.

The Ministry can withhold releases to districts, which do not hold regular meetings of Vigilance and Monitoring Committees.

Comments

Other News

India lost Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud in five years: DoT

India has lost more than Rs 52,000 crore to cyber fraud over the last five years, officials have revealed. Out of approximately 60 lakh cyber fraud complaints received, more than 3,000 cases have been resolved and six cyber fraud setups have been busted. On the occ

India must not wait for its own Ella

In many Indian cities, children learn to wear masks before they are old enough to understand why. That reality should alarm us far more than it does. In 2020, nine-year-old Ella Adoo Kissi Debrah became the first person in the world to have air pollution officially recognized a

An ode to the cradle of humankind

The Alphabets of Africa: Poems By Abhay K. Vintage Classics, 280 pages, ₹499.00 Abhay K

Ahmedabad district railway network to be expanded

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Wednesday approved the Ahmedabad (Sarkhej) – Dholera Semi High-Speed Double Line project of Ministry of Railways with total cost of Rs. 20,667 crore (approx.). It will be Indian Railways 1st semi high-speed project

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said. Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici