Mr Pitroda, DD isn’t socially relevant. It’s irrelevant

A government committee’s suggestion to make private channels pay for DD and AIR’s irrelevant ‘social benefit programmes’ is not forced taxation. It is plain and simple highway robbery, where might as well be right

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | April 9, 2013


Sam Pitroda
Sam Pitroda

If you thought Indira Gandhi’s pseudo-socialist diktats are a thing of the past, and best left for WikiLeaks to handle further, you live in a fool’s world. It’s happening, it’s here, and it’s now. And it’s tough to figure out the expression and adjective of exasperation: incredulous or ridiculous?

With Doordarshan and All India Radio (AIR) run to the ground by successive governments, the UPA administration now wants private television channels to fund, at least partially, these two so-called public service networks.

According to a report in today’s Hindustan Times, a committee formed by the government wants private channels to pay a ‘public broadcast fee’ to the government, which will be used by DD and AIR to run social benefit programmes.

While the jury is out on the purported ‘benefits’ brought in by the programmes run on DD and AIR, the government’s sheer expectation is amazing and exasperating in equal parts. Why should the private channels part with any money, raked in through programmes made painstakingly, for programmes on rival stations where officials purportedly scratch all other body parts but their brain?

Why should DD and AIR’s sheer incompetence, lethargy and unprofessionalism, already subsidised by the average taxpayer, get more dole?

Why should a private channel’s success be seen as a source from where it could be fleeced?

Why should DD’s utterly ludicrous programmes be made in the first place, screened thereafter to inflict horror on the poor public, and, as a salad dressing, get funds both public and private?

Why should programmes ideated by some babu (allegedly with brains), and cleared by another babu as allegedly beneficial to the society at large, deserve to get any money — let alone bleed rival channels?

Why should the information and broadcasting ministry, under the aegis of the uber-chic Manish Tewari, not let the private channels do both the ideating and executing work for such programmes if they are to cough up a ‘fee’?

The committee, headed by Sam Pitroda, the chairman of national innovation council, was formed to propose ways to maintain the autonomous status of Prasar Bharati and have an independent financing mechanism, the report states.

Autonomous? Doordarshan? Did the committee members read up one too many Santa-Banta jokes to take up the mandate? How can they ever suggest “ways to maintain” a status which does not exist in the first place? Hang on, there must be a disconnect somewhere. Didn’t Ajai Shukla, hired from a private channel to head DD’s primetime, blue-chip programnme News Night, had to quit just the other day, reportedly the victim of an anti-government tirade by the BJP’s Tarun Vijay on his programme? [More here]

Didn’t a circular sent out on March 14, reportedly signed by Prasar Bharati CEO Jawahar Sircar, spell it out for all those unique folks toying with the words autonomy and autonomous within the ambits of DDA that “no programme, content will be put on air in DD (N) 24-hour transmission without the explicit approval of DG (News)/ ADG (News). No guest will be invited for any news/ current affairs or any other programme on DD (News) without the prior approval of DG (News)/ADG (News)”?

So who is the government kidding? Who does it think it is fooling with words like public service obligation?

The HT report says Manish Tewari has ruled out the possibility of keeping Prasar Bharati free from government control if his ministry has to foot the bill. “Two-thirds of the I&B ministry's budget — Rs. 18.85 billion out of Rs. 28 billion — goes to Prasar Bharati. I am the recruiting authority, the disciplinary authority, the sanctioning authority. Yet, I am supposed to have them at arm's length. I am not God," he is quoted.

That’s quite all right, Mr Tewari. Just what makes you think private parties would be willing to chip in for inane programmes with money that is likely to be used to prop up your party and your government?

So, no, this is not forced taxation — this is plain and simple highway robbery.

This is not just another bad idea. It’s an incredibly reprehensible idea that should be flung away with force.

 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter