RaGa in 3D version: is it too little and too late?

Despite scaling up the pitch and modulation, that’s Rahul Gandhi’s much-awaited speech at AICC session in a nutshell

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | January 17, 2014


Rahul Gandhi: The opposition is
Rahul Gandhi: The opposition is

Comparisons being natural in political arena, especially when discussing the Gandhi family, one could not but recall Rajiv Gandhi’s “naani yaad dila denge” comment as Rahul Gandhi began his address at the AICC session in New Delhi shortly after 4 on Friday afternoon. The fourth-generation scion of the Nehru-Gandhi family may not have used the same set of words but the unusually scaled up tone, tenor and pitch of his nearly-30-minute speech seemed to suggest he was getting set to do just that – take the fight to the opposition.

It was an unusually aggressive Rahul Gandhi – not just the raised pitch but in body language as well, not just the words but in what remained unsaid as well, using his hands, jabbing the air with his finger and charging up thousands of Congress workers assembled at Talkatora indoor stadium but intending to reach across to the millions outside.

Unlike mouthing ideals and philosophies at events such as the CII speech last year, where he came across as well-meaning but vague for most part, evoking smiles and motherly sympathy among the people, the AICC speech saw him gunning for the denouement with an end sight right from the word go. He touched upon the issues that need a retouch or three as elections draw closer – the outgoing government’s achievements, popular sops like advocating for 12 subsidised cylinders a year, reminding the hard work required to keep the economy going at a fair clip (“6 to 8 percent growth”), and reminding the opposition at the same time that his party is anything but a punching bag for others to practice mock jabbing.

ALSO READ: Can Rahul be the Krishna for Congress that Rajiv was?

Significantly, Gandhi also steered clear of attempting to scale a purported philosophical height – his earlier speeches were marked by fuzzy words and phrases like “poverty is a state of mind”, “Dalits need Jupiter’s escape velocity to succeed” UPA is “a beehive”, "if India is a computer, Congress is its default programme” and so forth. Though his emphasis that the Congress is not a party but a “soch” (or an idea) threatened to go down the same lane (recall his speech at the Jaipur chintan shivir, around this time last year, "It (Congress) is a funny party. It is the largest political organization in the world but perhaps does not have a single rule or regulation. We create new rules every two minutes and then dump them. Nobody knows the rules in the party”) but for the explanation to back it up.

With party president Sonia Gandhi earlier in the day making it clear that there would be no change from the Congress Working Committee’s decision not to appoint Rahul as PM candidate, the party vice-president seemed to have shed the chains that sort of bound him, asserting himself more as the leader of the pack, despite calling himself a “foot soldier” of the party. While Gandhi expectedly took on his chief opponent, BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi, by asserting that the Congress does not “light communal fires" and that "democracy is not rule by one person, he also seems to have taken Arvind Kejriwal and his Aam Aadmi Party seriously, unlike the BJP, which is clearly in a dismissive mode.

In an attempt to take the wind out of AAP’s fight against corruption and stand for transparency, Gandhi spent a fair deal of time emphasising that his party had given “you, the people” the right to information (RTI), without anyone calling for it, and passed the Lokpal bill while others were busy talking about it.
While Gandhi is still to solve his problems – he gave a thumbs-up to Mani Shankar Aiyar publicly for his work in the panchayati raj ministry on a day the senior Congressman is facing major flak for his unnecessary and unparliamentary arrogance in deriding Modi’s modest past as a tea seller – and make his pitch match that of Modi, Friday’s certainly was a new release of an old film that did average business. Whether it will become a blockbuster like Sholay’s 3D version released last Friday only time will tell but as the old axiom goes, is it all too little, too late?

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter