Rahul's idea fails like Rajiv's Panchayati Raj Bill

Repeat of scenes in Rajya Sabha as opposition combines to defeat the statute amendment

PTI | December 28, 2011



In a strange coincidence, Rahul Gandhi's idea of conferring Constitutional status on Lokpal failed in the Lok Sabha much like his father Rajiv Gandhi's Panchayati Raj Bill 22 years ago.

A BJP MP sought to strike an ominous note of coincidence claiming that government of the day was not lucky whenever the Lokpal Bill was taken up and on occasions, the Lok Sabha was also dissolved.

The Constitution (116th Amendment) Bill to confer Constitutional status on Lokpal was defeated in the Lok Sabha late last night by a determined Opposition, helped by the absence of parties supporting the government from outside like SP, BSP and RJD.

It was a repeat of the scenes in Rajya Sabha in 1989 when the Opposition combined to defeat the statute amendment bill to confer Constitutional status to Panchayat Raj institutions.

Soon after the late Prime Minister dissolved Lok Sabha and went to polls which his party lost. But a bill to confer Constitutional status to Panchayati Raj instititutions was passed after the Congress returned to power in 1991.

About the other coincidence, BJP Deputy Leader in the Rajya Sabha S S Ahluwalia claims that when Parliament had taken up the Lokpal Bill for considerations, there were occasions when the Lok Sabha got dissolved.

He said this has been the case since 1968. That year, The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill was introduced on May nine. It was referred to the Select Committee of Parliament.

It was passed in the Lok Sabha as "The Lokpal and Lokayukta Bill, 1969" on August 20 1969. However, before this Bill could be passed by the Rajya Sabha, the Fourth Lok Sabha was dissolved and consequently this Bill lapsed.

Then on August 11, 1971 another Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill was introduced. It was neither referred to any Committee, nor passed by any House. It lapsed consequent upon the dissolution of the Fifth Lok Sabha.

Later, the Lokpal bill was brought on July 28, 1977. It was referred to a Joint Select Committee of both the Houses of Parliament. Before the recommendations of the Joint Select Committee could be considered, the Sixth Lok Sabha was dissolved and consequently this Bill also lapsed.

The Lokpal Bill, 1985 was introduced on August 28 that year and referred to a Joint Select Committee of Parliament.

However, the Bill was withdrawn by the then Government because of its inadequacy to cover different types of situations.

While withdrawing it, the Government of the day said it would later come forward with a comprehensive legislation to deal with redress of public grievances.

The Lokpal Bill came again in 1989 as it was introduced on December 29. However, the Bill lapsed consequent upon the dissolution of the Ninth Lok Sabha on 13th March, 1991.

The United Front government introduced yet another bill on the issue on Sept 13, 1996. It was referred to the Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs for examination and report. The Standing Committee presented its report to Parliament on May 9, 1997 making wide ranging amendments to the various provisions of the Bill.

Before the Government could finalise its stand on the various recommendations of the Standing Committee, the Eleventh Lok Sabha was dissolved.

The last such measure was brought on August 14, 2001 by the BJP-led NDA Government. It was referred to the Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs for examination and report but the Government bowed out of office in May 2004.

Comments

 

Other News

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter