Rajiv's self-governance dream is shattered, so let's not talk about it

Read the report on Panchayati Raj the government wants to hide from you and me

prasanna

Prasanna Mohanty | July 9, 2010


PM unveiling the `State of the Panchayats Report 2008-09`
PM unveiling the `State of the Panchayats Report 2008-09`

Censorship is back. Only the style is more subtle this time, not the in-your-face variety that the Emergency of 1975 symbolised.

When the prime minister unveiled the “State of Panchayats Report 2008-09” to mark the National Panchayati Raj Day on April 24 this year, he was probably not aware that the report contained a chapter on “PESA, Left-Wing Extremism and Governance” which contained many unpalatable truths about governance.

More than two months have passed since then but the panchayati raj ministry has not made that report public to hide these truths from you and me. Now it is planning to publish the report minus this chapter!

What does this chapter say? It tells how successive central and state governments have turned Rajiv Gandhi’s dream of taking self-governance to the grassroots level sour. It tells how the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act of 1996 (PESA), which is meant for the tribal areas that the Maoists have seized, has been violated consistently. How the extensive power and complete command that the tribal communities have been given over their life, their environment and everything that has anything to do with them have been denied to them for more than 14 years.

It says by way of its concluding remark: “A decade-and-half on, however, its (PESA’s) promise of self-governance has a long way to go, even as the tribal communities grapple with intensifying challenges and conflicts, against the backdrop of liberalization.”

The report also tells how other constitutional provisions like the Fifth Schedule, meant specifically for the tribal areas, have been completely bypassed. How not one single Governor of nine states having the Scheduled Areas has ever fulfill his or her constitutional responsibility in protecting the tribals’ interest in all the 60 years!

It also says how the Forest Rights Act of 2006 is being violated in denying tribals the rights that have been guaranteed to them—over their land, over their forests, over the hills, over minor forest produces and all other natural resources, including minor minerals.

More importantly, when the country is grappling with the Maoist menace and the policy and law makers are running around like headless chicken in their search for an answer to the basic problem—that is lack of development—this report points out what to do to reverse the situation.

But, as the report exposes the government’s gross violation of its constitutional and other legal obligations, the Panchayati Raj ministry has decided to censor it.

Read the censored chapter in the attachment below.

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter